Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony NEX-C3
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfd20/dfd201ee1ec08dd7f35737363e18ef59716b03bf" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2cec1/2cec10f20284888a461f10799c9bdd17f4863091" alt="Sony Alpha NEX-C3 front Sony Alpha NEX-C3 front"
91 Imaging
56 Features
57 Overall
56
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony NEX-C3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Released February 2020
- Old Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1280 x 720 video
- Sony E Mount
- 225g - 110 x 60 x 33mm
- Revealed August 2011
- Succeeded the Sony NEX-3
- Later Model is Sony NEX-F3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony NEX-C3 Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony NEX-C3, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and NEX-C3 (16MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and NEX-C3 (APS-C) offer different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-M1 III was announced 8 years later than the NEX-C3 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony NEX-C3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go right into a complete comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the E-M1 III matches up versus the NEX-C3 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony NEX-C3 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III & Sony Alpha NEX-C3. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery & Sony NEX-C3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Sony NEX-C3
E-M1 III | NEX-C3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2020 | ![]() | August 2011 | More recent by 104 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 920k | Clearer display (+117k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-C3 over the Olympus E-M1 III
NEX-C3 | E-M1 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Sony NEX-C3
E-M1 III | NEX-C3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurement |
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony NEX-C3 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 III has got outer dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") accompanied by a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) while the Sony NEX-C3 has dimensions of 110mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony NEX-C3 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the E-M1 III against the NEX-C3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80183/80183fb8222d7e81c27b14f7b9565bef57533d29" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony NEX-C3 size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony NEX-C3 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 III and NEX-C3 is 67 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9087/b9087f166a2b08020b71e421fc23e497481c8680" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony NEX-C3 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony NEX-C3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony NEX-C3 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to imagine the gap in sensor measurements merely by seeing a spec sheet. The graphic here may give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 III and NEX-C3.
As you can see, both of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 III with its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Olympus E-M1 III will provide greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 III provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd49f/dd49f3809f2dcd0235b3833278d9091b84808d35" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony NEX-C3 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony NEX-C3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8153/c8153ecf7126052adf2ba660608e0fc4204d15be" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony NEX-C3 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2020-02-11 | 2011-08-22 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic IX | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4912 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 25 |
Cross focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
Available lenses | 107 | 121 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0 frames per second | 6.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250s | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 580g (1.28 pounds) | 225g (0.50 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 110 x 60 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.2 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1083 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 photographs | 400 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Dual | 1 |
Price at release | $1,800 | $343 |