Clicky

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony RX10 II

Portability
67
Imaging
62
Features
96
Overall
75
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II front
Portability
58
Imaging
52
Features
77
Overall
62

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony RX10 II Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
  • Released February 2020
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1 II
Sony RX10 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-200mm (F2.8) lens
  • 813g - 129 x 88 x 102mm
  • Revealed June 2015
  • Replaced the Sony RX10
  • New Model is Sony RX10 III
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony RX10 II Overview

Let's take a closer look at the Olympus E-M1 III and Sony RX10 II, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-M1 III (20MP) and the RX10 II (20MP) is pretty similar but the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and RX10 II (1") feature different sensor dimensions.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The E-M1 III was brought out 4 years after the RX10 II which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony RX10 II being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before getting straight into a complete comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the E-M1 III grades vs the RX10 II when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Sony RX10 II

 E-M1 III RX10 II 
RevealedFebruary 2020June 2015Newer by 57 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating screen
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sony RX10 II over the Olympus E-M1 III

 RX10 II E-M1 III 
Screen resolution1229k1037kCrisper screen (+192k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Sony RX10 II

 E-M1 III RX10 II 
Manually focus Very exact focusing
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen sizing

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony RX10 II Physical Comparison

If you are intending to travel with your camera, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 III features external measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") and a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) while the Sony RX10 II has specifications of 129mm x 88mm x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") and a weight of 813 grams (1.79 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-M1 III and Sony RX10 II in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the E-M1 III against the RX10 II.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony RX10 II size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 III and RX10 II is 67 and 58 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony RX10 II top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony RX10 II Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it can be difficult to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The pic below may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 III and RX10 II.

As you can see, both the cameras enjoy the same exact megapixels albeit different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 III has got the bigger sensor which is going to make achieving shallow depth of field easier. The newer E-M1 III provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony RX10 II sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony RX10 II Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony RX10 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Portrait photography factors
Sony RX10 II Portrait photography factors
77
you can focus manually
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports face detect focus
saves RAW files
71
manual focus
decent megapixels (20MP)
sensor size is nice (1")
comes with face detection autofocus
supports RAW formats
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Street photography features
Sony RX10 II Street photography features
78
fully articulated screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
provides focus via touch
environment proof
very good high ISO (25,600)
72
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is nice (1")
supports RAW formats
weather sealing
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Sports photography features
Sony RX10 II Sports photography features
81
high shutter speed (1/8,000s)
silent mode (1/32,000s)
fast shooting (60.0 frames/s)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports tracking focus
environment proof
comes with phase detect auto focus
68
silent shutter (1/32,000 seconds)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (1")
comes with tracking autofocus
weather sealing
no phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III as a Travel photography camera
Sony RX10 II as a Travel photography camera
79
environment proof
connects via bluetooth
provides focus via touch
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
selfie friendly screen
56
weather sealing
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
built-in flash
rather wide (24mm)
does not have Timelapse function
does not offer selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III as a Landscape photography camera
Sony RX10 II as a Landscape photography camera
81
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a decent size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
no low pass filter
very good high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW files
environment proof
has double storage slots
62
manual focus
rather wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (1")
supports RAW formats
weather sealing
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not have Timelapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III as a Vlogging camera
Sony RX10 II as a Vlogging camera
79
selfie friendly screen
touchscreen capability
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
supports face detect focus
high video quality (4096 x 2160 pixels)
does have microphone port
31
rather wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection autofocus
great video quality (3840 x 2160 pixels)
includes external microphone support
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony RX10 II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 III and Sony RX10 II
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIISony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II
Category Pro Mirrorless Large Sensor Superzoom
Released 2020-02-11 2015-06-10
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic IX Bionz X
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 5184 x 3888 5472 x 3648
Max native ISO 25600 12800
Max enhanced ISO - 25600
Min native ISO 200 125
RAW photos
Min enhanced ISO 64 64
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 121 25
Cross type focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-200mm (8.3x)
Largest aperture - f/2.8
Macro focusing range - 3cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 2.7
Screen
Type of screen Fully Articulated Tilting
Screen sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 1,037 thousand dots 1,229 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots 2,359 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage 100% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x 0.7x
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 30s
Max shutter speed 1/8000s 1/2000s
Max silent shutter speed 1/32000s 1/32000s
Continuous shutter rate 60.0 frames/s 14.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 10.20 m
Flash options Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Max video resolution 4096x2160 3840x2160
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 580g (1.28 lbs) 813g (1.79 lbs)
Dimensions 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") 129 x 88 x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 70
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 23.0
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.6
DXO Low light rating not tested 531
Other
Battery life 420 pictures 400 pictures
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLH-1 NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous)
Time lapse feature
Storage type Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Card slots 2 Single
Pricing at release $1,800 $998