Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony RX10 II
Portability
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
Portability
58 Imaging
52 Features
77 Overall
62
58 Imaging
52 Features
77 Overall
62
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony RX10 II Key Specs
Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Released February 2020
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1 II
Sony RX10 II
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-200mm (F2.8) lens
- 813g - 129 x 88 x 102mm
- Revealed June 2015
- Replaced the Sony RX10
- New Model is Sony RX10 III
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony RX10 II Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Olympus E-M1 III and Sony RX10 II, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-M1 III (20MP) and the RX10 II (20MP) is pretty similar but the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and RX10 II (1") feature different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe E-M1 III was brought out 4 years after the RX10 II which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony RX10 II being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting straight into a complete comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the E-M1 III grades vs the RX10 II when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony RX10 II Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery and Sony RX10 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Sony RX10 II
| E-M1 III | RX10 II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2020 |  | June 2015 | Newer by 57 months |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 II over the Olympus E-M1 III
| RX10 II | E-M1 III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 1229k |  | 1037k | Crisper screen (+192k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Sony RX10 II
| E-M1 III | RX10 II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony RX10 II Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 III features external measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") and a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) while the Sony RX10 II has specifications of 129mm x 88mm x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") and a weight of 813 grams (1.79 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M1 III and Sony RX10 II in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the E-M1 III against the RX10 II.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 III and RX10 II is 67 and 58 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony RX10 II Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be difficult to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The pic below may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 III and RX10 II.
As you can see, both the cameras enjoy the same exact megapixels albeit different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 III has got the bigger sensor which is going to make achieving shallow depth of field easier. The newer E-M1 III provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony RX10 II Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus E-M1 III Portrait photography factors
Sony RX10 II Portrait photography factors
you can focus manually
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports face detect focus
saves RAW files
manual focus
decent megapixels (20MP)
sensor size is nice (1")
comes with face detection autofocus
supports RAW formats
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Olympus E-M1 III Street photography features
Sony RX10 II Street photography features
fully articulated screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
provides focus via touch
environment proof
very good high ISO (25,600)
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is nice (1")
supports RAW formats
weather sealing
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Olympus E-M1 III Sports photography features
Sony RX10 II Sports photography features
high shutter speed (1/8,000s)
silent mode (1/32,000s)
fast shooting (60.0 frames/s)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports tracking focus
environment proof
comes with phase detect auto focus
silent shutter (1/32,000 seconds)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (1")
comes with tracking autofocus
weather sealing
no phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Olympus E-M1 III as a Travel photography camera
Sony RX10 II as a Travel photography camera
environment proof
connects via bluetooth
provides focus via touch
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
selfie friendly screen
weather sealing
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
built-in flash
rather wide (24mm)
does not have Timelapse function
does not offer selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Olympus E-M1 III as a Landscape photography camera
Sony RX10 II as a Landscape photography camera
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a decent size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
no low pass filter
very good high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW files
environment proof
has double storage slots
manual focus
rather wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (1")
supports RAW formats
weather sealing
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not have Timelapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 III as a Vlogging camera
Sony RX10 II as a Vlogging camera
selfie friendly screen
touchscreen capability
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
supports face detect focus
high video quality (4096 x 2160 pixels)
does have microphone port
rather wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection autofocus
great video quality (3840 x 2160 pixels)
includes external microphone support
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony RX10 II Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II |
| Category | Pro Mirrorless | Large Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2020-02-11 | 2015-06-10 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic IX | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 116.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Min enhanced ISO | 64 | 64 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 121 | 25 |
| Cross type focus points | 121 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 24-200mm (8.3x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
| Number of lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dots | 1,229 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | 2,359 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.7x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
| Max silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | 1/32000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 60.0 frames/s | 14.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 10.20 m |
| Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 580g (1.28 lbs) | 813g (1.79 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 129 x 88 x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 70 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 531 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 420 pictures | 400 pictures |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLH-1 | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 2 | Single |
| Pricing at release | $1,800 | $998 |