Clicky

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony T900

Portability
67
Imaging
62
Features
96
Overall
75
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 front
Portability
96
Imaging
34
Features
30
Overall
32

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony T900 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
  • Revealed February 2020
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M1 II
Sony T900
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
  • 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
  • Revealed February 2009
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony T900 Overview

Lets look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-M1 III versus Sony T900, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Sony. There exists a significant gap between the image resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and T900 (12MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and T900 (1/2.3") have different sensor sizes.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-M1 III was released 11 years later than the T900 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before diving into a in depth comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the E-M1 III matches up vs the T900 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Sony T900

 E-M1 III T900 
RevealedFebruary 2020February 2009Fresher by 134 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution1037k922kCrisper screen (+115k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Olympus E-M1 III

 T900 E-M1 III 
Screen size3.5"3"Bigger screen (+0.5")

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Sony T900

 E-M1 III T900 
Manual focus More precise focusing
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 III comes with physical measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) while the Sony T900 has measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") along with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-M1 III versus Sony T900 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you use at that time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the E-M1 III versus the T900.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony T900 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 III and T900 is 67 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony T900 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it can be hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizing purely by reading a spec sheet. The graphic below might provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 III and T900.

As you can see, both of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 III because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M1 III will deliver greater detail as a result of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 III should have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony T900 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony T900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Portrait photography highlights
Sony T900 Portrait photography highlights
77
you can focus manually
MP count decent (20MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports face detect autofocus
exports RAW files
27
focusing manually
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-M1 III
Street photography with Sony T900
78
screen articulates
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
supports touch focus
weather proofing
above average ISO range (25,600)
57
built in image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III as a Sports photography camera
Sony T900 as a Sports photography camera
81
great max shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
silent mode (1/32,000 seconds)
max frames per second high (60.0 frames/s)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (20MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports tracking focus
weather proofing
supports phase detect autofocus
24
built in image stabilization (Optical)
low max shutter speed (1/1,000 seconds)
slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Travel photography highlights
Sony T900 Travel photography highlights
79
weather proofing
connects via bluetooth
supports touch focus
MP count decent (20MP)
display is selfie friendly
51
built-in flash
doesn't have Timelapse mode
low megapixels (12MP)
does not have selfie friendly display
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Landscape photography features
Sony T900 Landscape photography features
81
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
does not have anti-alias filter
above average ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW files
weather proofing
two card slots
36
focusing manually
very good size screen (3.5")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
manual exposure not possible
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Vlogging details
Sony T900 Vlogging details
79
display is selfie friendly
built-in touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
supports face detect autofocus
high res video (4096 x 2160 pixels)
comes with microphone socket
28
has touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
does not have selfie friendly display
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have external microphone jack
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony T900 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 III and Sony T900
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIISony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
Type Pro Mirrorless Ultracompact
Revealed 2020-02-11 2009-02-17
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic IX -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 5184 x 3888 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 25600 3200
Lowest native ISO 200 80
RAW photos
Lowest enhanced ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Total focus points 121 9
Cross type focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 35-140mm (4.0x)
Max aperture - f/3.5-10.0
Number of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display sizing 3" 3.5"
Display resolution 1,037 thousand dot 922 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 2s
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000s 1/1000s
Fastest quiet shutter speed 1/32000s -
Continuous shutter speed 60.0fps 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 2.90 m (Auto ISO)
Flash options Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 4096x2160 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 580 gr (1.28 lb) 143 gr (0.32 lb)
Physical dimensions 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 420 shots -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLH-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal
Storage slots Two Single
Price at release $1,800 $300