Clicky

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony TX200V

Portability
67
Imaging
62
Features
96
Overall
75
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V front
Portability
96
Imaging
42
Features
48
Overall
44

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony TX200V Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
  • Launched February 2020
  • Superseded the Olympus E-M1 II
Sony TX200V
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
  • 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
  • Announced January 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony TX200V Overview

Following is a extensive comparison of the Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony TX200V, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-M1 III (20MP) and the TX200V (18MP) is fairly close but the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and TX200V (1/2.3") offer different sensor measurements.

Photography Glossary

The E-M1 III was announced 8 years after the TX200V which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.

Before going right into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick view of how the E-M1 III scores vs the TX200V with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Sony TX200V

 E-M1 III TX200V 
AnnouncedFebruary 2020January 2012More modern by 98 months
Focus manually More accurate focus
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Olympus E-M1 III

 TX200V E-M1 III 
Display dimensions3.3"3"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1230k1037kSharper display (+193k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Sony TX200V

 E-M1 III TX200V 
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 III comes with outside measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") and a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) whilst the Sony TX200V has dimensions of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") having a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony TX200V in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the E-M1 III compared to the TX200V.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony TX200V size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 III and TX200V is 67 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony TX200V top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison

Often, it is very difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes merely by researching a spec sheet. The pic underneath will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 III and TX200V.

Clearly, both of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 III with its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M1 III will result in greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 III should have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony TX200V sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony TX200V Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Portrait photography details
Sony TX200V Portrait photography details
77
manual focus
resolution is good (20MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
includes face detection focusing
saves RAW files
36
decent sensor resolution (18 megapixels)
includes face detect autofocus
focusing manually not possible
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III as a Street photography camera
Sony TX200V as a Street photography camera
78
screen can move to multiple angles
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
comes with focus via touch
environment proofing
great high ISO (25,600)
68
built in image stabilization (Optical)
comes with focus by touch
environment proof
fixed screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III as a Sports photography camera
Sony TX200V as a Sports photography camera
81
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000 seconds)
quiet shooting (1/32,000 seconds)
fast continuous shooting (60.0 fps)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
includes tracking autofocus
environment proofing
comes with phase detect AF
49
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (18MP)
includes tracking focus
environment proof
no shutter priority
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-M1 III
Travel photography with Sony TX200V
79
environment proofing
has bluetooth
comes with focus via touch
resolution is good (20MP)
display is selfie friendly
71
environment proof
comes with focus by touch
decent sensor resolution (18MP)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
does not offer selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-M1 III
Landscape photography with Sony TX200V
81
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
resolution is good (20MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
no low pass filter
great high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW files
environment proofing
2 card slots
47
reasonably wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3.3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (18MP)
environment proof
focusing manually not possible
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
no manual mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Vlogging info
Sony TX200V Vlogging info
79
display is selfie friendly
touchscreen capability
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
includes face detection focusing
video resolution high (4096 x 2160 pxls)
does have external mic support
35
reasonably wide (28mm)
touchscreen capability
built in image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
doesn't have microphone support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony TX200V Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 III and Sony TX200V
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIISony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V
Class Pro Mirrorless Ultracompact
Launched 2020-02-11 2012-01-30
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic IX BIONZ
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 18MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 5184 x 3888 4896 x 3672
Max native ISO 25600 12800
Lowest native ISO 200 64
RAW pictures
Lowest enhanced ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 121 9
Cross type focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-140mm (5.0x)
Max aperture - f/3.5-4.8
Macro focusing range - 3cm
Available lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 3.3"
Resolution of screen 1,037k dots 1,230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen tech - 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 2 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Max silent shutter speed 1/32000 seconds -
Continuous shutter rate 60.0 frames per second 10.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 3.10 m
Flash options Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 4096x2160 1920x1080
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 580 grams (1.28 lb) 129 grams (0.28 lb)
Physical dimensions 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 420 photographs 220 photographs
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLH-1 NP-BN
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Two 1
Launch price $1,800 $500