Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony TX5
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
96 Imaging
33 Features
33 Overall
33
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony TX5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Introduced February 2020
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-6.3) lens
- 148g - 94 x 57 x 18mm
- Released February 2010
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony TX5 Overview
In this write-up, we are matching up the Olympus E-M1 III and Sony TX5, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and TX5 (10MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and TX5 (1/2.4") come with totally different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-M1 III was released 10 years later than the TX5 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony TX5 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the E-M1 III grades vs the TX5 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony TX5 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX5. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery & Sony TX5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Sony TX5
| E-M1 III | TX5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2020 |  | February 2010 | Fresher by 122 months |
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display resolution | 1037k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+807k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony TX5 over the Olympus E-M1 III
| TX5 | E-M1 III |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Sony TX5
| E-M1 III | TX5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony TX5 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 III comes with exterior dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") accompanied by a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) and the Sony TX5 has specifications of 94mm x 57mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 148 grams (0.33 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M1 III and Sony TX5 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the E-M1 III versus the TX5.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 III and TX5 is 67 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony TX5 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to envision the difference between sensor sizing only by reading through specs. The photograph underneath will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 III and TX5.
All in all, both cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 III featuring a larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M1 III will give greater detail as a result of its extra 10MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a little more aggressively. The younger E-M1 III will have an edge in sensor technology.
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony TX5 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony TX5 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX5 |
| Class | Pro Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2020-02-11 | 2010-02-18 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic IX | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.4" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
| Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 27.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 121 | 9 |
| Cross focus points | 121 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/3.5-6.3 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Available lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 1,037k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 2 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 2.90 m |
| Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 580g (1.28 lb) | 148g (0.33 lb) |
| Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 94 x 57 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 420 shots | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | BLH-1 | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/ Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | Dual | 1 |
| Launch cost | $1,800 | $239 |