Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony TX9
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfd20/dfd201ee1ec08dd7f35737363e18ef59716b03bf" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7cb00/7cb00ed60de78a6725fc673171ba91315aad3000" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9 front"
95 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony TX9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Released February 2020
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 149g - 98 x 60 x 18mm
- Announced July 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony TX9 Overview
Here is a thorough comparison of the Olympus E-M1 III versus Sony TX9, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and TX9 (12MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and TX9 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-M1 III was launched 9 years later than the TX9 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony TX9 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the E-M1 III matches up versus the TX9 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony TX9 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery & Sony TX9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Sony TX9
E-M1 III | TX9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2020 | ![]() | July 2010 | Fresher by 117 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 922k | Crisper screen (+115k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony TX9 over the Olympus E-M1 III
TX9 | E-M1 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Sony TX9
E-M1 III | TX9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony TX9 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 III offers external measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) and the Sony TX9 has dimensions of 98mm x 60mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") with a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M1 III versus Sony TX9 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M1 III and the TX9.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7bdc1/7bdc1e333c195b921891b5b8aef50b7354c72ab3" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony TX9 size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony TX9 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 III and TX9 is 67 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/16745/16745e73c3a41f6ed813592a1066e310fa416b08" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony TX9 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony TX9 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony TX9 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to see the contrast in sensor sizing purely by viewing specifications. The visual underneath will give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 III and TX9.
Plainly, both cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 III due to its bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 III will provide you with greater detail utilizing its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 III is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1921/f19210bcebe064dcfae355470174a884a3203bfe" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony TX9 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony TX9 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony TX9 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b57e5/b57e52f433762ba17a24a9215caccf213d0db30d" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony TX9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony TX9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony TX9 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Released | 2020-02-11 | 2010-07-08 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic IX | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 9 |
Cross type focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,037k dots | 922k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 2 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 3.80 m |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (50 fps), 1440 x 1080 (50, 25fps), 1280 x 720 (25 fps), 640 x 480 (25 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 580 grams (1.28 lbs) | 149 grams (0.33 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 98 x 60 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 pictures | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | 2 | One |
Retail pricing | $1,800 | $799 |