Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony W830
Portability
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
Portability
96 Imaging
45 Features
26 Overall
37
96 Imaging
45 Features
26 Overall
37
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony W830 Key Specs
Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Released February 2020
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M1 II
Sony W830
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F3.3-6.3) lens
- 122g - 93 x 52 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony W830 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus E-M1 III and Sony W830, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-M1 III (20MP) and the W830 (20MP) is relatively similar but the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and W830 (1/2.3") come with different sensor measurements.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-M1 III was brought out 6 years after the W830 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony W830 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving in to a complete comparison, below is a short summation of how the E-M1 III grades against the W830 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony W830 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W830. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery and Sony W830 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Sony W830
| E-M1 III | W830 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2020 |  | January 2014 | Newer by 75 months |
| Focus manually |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 1037k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony W830 over the Olympus E-M1 III
| W830 | E-M1 III |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Sony W830
| E-M1 III | W830 |
|---|
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony W830 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 III offers physical measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) whilst the Sony W830 has proportions of 93mm x 52mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.9") and a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M1 III and Sony W830 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-M1 III compared to the W830.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 III and W830 is 67 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony W830 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to picture the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing specs. The pic here might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 III and W830.
All in all, both the cameras posses the exact same megapixel count albeit different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 III offers the bigger sensor which is going to make achieving bokeh easier. The more modern E-M1 III provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony W830 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus E-M1 III Portrait photography factors
Sony W830 Portrait photography factors
you can focus manually
good megapixels (20MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with face detect focusing
saves RAW files
megapixel count good (20MP)
offers face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
no manual control
no external flash support
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Olympus E-M1 III Street photography info
Sony W830 Street photography info
fully articulated screen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
supports focus by touch
environment sealing
very good high ISO (25,600)
image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Olympus E-M1 III as a Sports photography camera
Sony W830 as a Sports photography camera
great max shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
quiet shutter (1/32,000 seconds)
max frames per second high (60.0 frames per second)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good megapixels (20MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with tracking focus
environment sealing
supports phase detect AF
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (20MP)
offers tracking autofocus
low frames per second (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Olympus E-M1 III as a Travel photography camera
Sony W830 as a Travel photography camera
environment sealing
has bluetooth
supports focus by touch
good megapixels (20 megapixels)
selfie friendly display
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
flash built-in
fairly wide (25mm)
missing Timelapse recording
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Olympus E-M1 III Landscape photography highlights
Sony W830 Landscape photography highlights
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good megapixels (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
doesnt have anti aliasing filter
very good high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW files
environment sealing
has double storage slots
fairly wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (20MP)
lack of manual focus
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
small screen (2.7")
no manual control
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
missing Timelapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Olympus E-M1 III
Vlogging with Sony W830
selfie friendly display
touch screen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
comes with face detect focusing
high quality video (4096 x 2160 pxls)
comes with microphone port
fairly wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection focusing
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
display isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing external microphone support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony W830 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W830 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W830 |
| Type | Pro Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2020-02-11 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic IX | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5152 x 3864 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 121 | - |
| Cross focus points | 121 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 25-200mm (8.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-6.3 |
| Number of lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 1,037k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | - | Clear Photo LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 2s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/1600s |
| Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 60.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 2.80 m (with ISO auto) |
| Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto / Flash On / Slow Synchro / Flash Off / Advanced Flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 580 gr (1.28 lb) | 122 gr (0.27 lb) |
| Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 93 x 52 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 420 images | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | BLH-1 | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo, microSD/microSDHC |
| Card slots | Two | One |
| Cost at launch | $1,800 | $128 |