Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ
71 Imaging
52 Features
85 Overall
65
![Olympus OM-D E-M1 front Olympus OM-D E-M1 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-OM-D-E-M1/Olympus-E-M1-front.jpg)
![Olympus SP-620 UZ front Olympus SP-620 UZ front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-SP-620-UZ/Olympus-SP-620-UZ-front.jpg)
78 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
- Revealed October 2013
- Later Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-525mm (F3.1-5.8) lens
- 435g - 110 x 74 x 74mm
- Released January 2012
- Superseded the Olympus SP-610UZ
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Olympus E-M1 and Olympus SP-620 UZ, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both created by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-M1 (16MP) and the SP-620 UZ (16MP) is fairly similar but the E-M1 (Four Thirds) and SP-620 UZ (1/2.3") boast different sensor dimensions.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
The E-M1 was revealed 22 months later than the SP-620 UZ making them a generation apart from one another. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-620 UZ being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick summation of how the E-M1 scores vs the SP-620 UZ with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 and Olympus SP-620 UZ. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 Gallery and Olympus SP-620 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Olympus SP-620 UZ
E-M1 | SP-620 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | October 2013 | ![]() | January 2012 | Fresher by 22 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+807k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-620 UZ over the Olympus E-M1
SP-620 UZ | E-M1 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 and Olympus SP-620 UZ
E-M1 | SP-620 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 enjoys outer measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") along with a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-620 UZ has measurements of 110mm x 74mm x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") along with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M1 and Olympus SP-620 UZ in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have during that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the E-M1 compared to the SP-620 UZ.
![Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ size comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-OM-D-E-M1-vs-Olympus-SP-620-UZ-size-comparison.jpg)
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 and SP-620 UZ is 71 and 78 respectively.
![Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-OM-D-E-M1-vs-Olympus-SP-620-UZ-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing just by reviewing specs. The visual here might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 and SP-620 UZ.
All in all, the 2 cameras have the same megapixel count but different sensor sizing. The E-M1 features the larger sensor which should make obtaining shallow depth of field less difficult. The more modern E-M1 should have an edge in sensor innovation.
![Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Olympus-OM-D-E-M1-vs-Olympus-SP-620-UZ-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
![Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-OM-D-E-M1-vs-Olympus-SP-620-UZ-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Olympus SP-620 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Olympus SP-620 UZ |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2013-10-28 | 2012-01-10 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePIC VII | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 81 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-525mm (21.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.1-5.8 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 6.00 m |
Flash options | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/320 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 497 gr (1.10 lbs) | 435 gr (0.96 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") | 110 x 74 x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 757 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $799 | $199 |