Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ
71 Imaging
52 Features
85 Overall
65
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/994ef/994ef7dee173aff9e3dc7d1b78984f0f0b8bbe9f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 front Olympus OM-D E-M1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0063/e00637e5677671b8b72fa1976b25d95bb3a79c37" alt="Olympus SP-810 UZ front Olympus SP-810 UZ front"
78 Imaging
37 Features
34 Overall
35
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
- Revealed October 2013
- Replacement is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-864mm (F2.9-5.7) lens
- 413g - 106 x 76 x 74mm
- Introduced July 2011
- Replaced the Olympus SP-800 UZ
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Overview
Here is a complete analysis of the Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both sold by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-M1 (16MP) and the SP-810 UZ (14MP) is fairly similar but the E-M1 (Four Thirds) and SP-810 UZ (1/2.3") provide different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-M1 was brought out 2 years later than the SP-810 UZ and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-810 UZ being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving into a detailed comparison, here is a simple overview of how the E-M1 matches up against the SP-810 UZ when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 and Olympus SP-810 UZ. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 Gallery and Olympus SP-810 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Olympus SP-810 UZ
E-M1 | SP-810 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | October 2013 | ![]() | July 2011 | Fresher by 28 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+807k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-810 UZ over the Olympus E-M1
SP-810 UZ | E-M1 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 and Olympus SP-810 UZ
E-M1 | SP-810 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 offers external measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") with a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs) and the Olympus SP-810 UZ has dimensions of 106mm x 76mm x 74mm (4.2" x 3.0" x 2.9") having a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the E-M1 and the SP-810 UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65f72/65f727e826316a63636c2dfec9748535d36053b7" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ size comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 and SP-810 UZ is 71 and 78 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f18b/6f18b3b0204b6c91a802c395b24e34a72bd0d56f" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizing purely by reviewing technical specs. The visual underneath may give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 and SP-810 UZ.
As you have seen, both of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 due to its larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh simpler and the Olympus E-M1 will offer you greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The younger E-M1 should have a benefit in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce6e2/ce6e2aac4d89d9d6f667b75baa377648e9fd5157" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fd28c/fd28ce83fb7d99165b1d57285025765d0ed5f2e4" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Olympus SP-810 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Olympus SP-810 UZ |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2013-10-28 | 2011-07-27 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePIC VII | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-864mm (36.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.9-5.7 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 1/4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/1200s |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | 0.7fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 6.20 m |
Flash modes | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/320s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 497g (1.10 pounds) | 413g (0.91 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") | 106 x 76 x 74mm (4.2" x 3.0" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 757 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLN-1 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $799 | $280 |