Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Announced July 2009
- Replacement is Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F) lens
- 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Announced August 2012
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and Galaxy Camera 4G (16MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and Galaxy Camera 4G (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe GR Digital III was revealed 4 years prior to the Galaxy Camera 4G and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the GR Digital III scores vs the Galaxy Camera 4G with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G. The full galleries are available at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery and Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
GR Digital III | Galaxy Camera 4G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
Screen resolution | 920k | 0k | Sharper screen (+920k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G over the Ricoh GR Digital III
Galaxy Camera 4G | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2012 | July 2009 | More recent by 37 months | |
Screen dimensions | 4.8" | 3" | Bigger screen (+1.8") | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
GR Digital III | Galaxy Camera 4G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR Digital III enjoys physical dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") and a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) while the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G has sizing of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") and a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Check the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have at that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the GR Digital III against the Galaxy Camera 4G.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GR Digital III and Galaxy Camera 4G is 92 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to picture the difference between sensor measurements only by reading through specifications. The graphic underneath will provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR Digital III and Galaxy Camera 4G.
To sum up, both of those cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The GR Digital III using its bigger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh easier and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G will give extra detail because of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs more aggressively. The older GR Digital III is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital III | Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GR Digital III | Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2009-07-27 | 2012-08-29 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | GR engine III | 1.4GHz Quad-Core |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | - |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 23-481mm (20.9x) |
Max aperture | f/1.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 4.8 inch |
Display resolution | 920k dot | 0k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | - | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1 seconds | - |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 208 grams (0.46 pounds) | 305 grams (0.67 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $399 | $550 |