Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus Tough-3000
71 Imaging
52 Features
85 Overall
65
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/994ef/994ef7dee173aff9e3dc7d1b78984f0f0b8bbe9f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 front Olympus OM-D E-M1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65bd8/65bd8807760d1aa9ce571a27b6fa183cf36228ef" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
- Launched October 2013
- Successor is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Launched January 2010
- Also referred to as mju Tough 3000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
Following is a in depth review of the Olympus E-M1 versus Olympus Tough-3000, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof and they are both offered by Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the E-M1 (16MP) and Tough-3000 (12MP) and the E-M1 (Four Thirds) and Tough-3000 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-M1 was unveiled 3 years after the Tough-3000 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera.
Before we go into a detailed comparison, here is a brief summary of how the E-M1 grades versus the Tough-3000 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 & Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 Gallery & Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Olympus Tough-3000
E-M1 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | October 2013 | ![]() | January 2010 | More modern by 47 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+807k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Olympus E-M1
Tough-3000 | E-M1 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 and Olympus Tough-3000
E-M1 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 has outer measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") along with a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs) and the Olympus Tough-3000 has proportions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M1 versus Olympus Tough-3000 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the E-M1 against the Tough-3000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7cea/b7cea604c191582c8c8d857c44c23bba6e21c1d9" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 and Tough-3000 is 71 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27842/27842ef0b1ce962855ea8c497d3d167bc172d555" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizes purely by researching a spec sheet. The image underneath might offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 and Tough-3000.
Clearly, both of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 using its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M1 will render extra detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs way more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eeb8a/eeb8a12bf4e07218b426969c2e0f22d4a934c6a8" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76fc7/76fc764bfa7492c6dd31f8881d5a8ee387b6580c" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
Alternate name | - | mju Tough 3000 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Launched | 2013-10-28 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePIC VII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focus range | - | 2cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,037k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/320 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 497g (1.10 lbs) | 159g (0.35 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 757 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $799 | $0 |