Clicky

Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-320

Portability
71
Imaging
53
Features
85
Overall
65
Olympus OM-D E-M1 front
 
Olympus TG-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
33
Overall
35

Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
  • Introduced October 2013
  • Later Model is Olympus E-M1 II
Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Revealed January 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview

Its time to look more closely at the Olympus E-M1 and Olympus TG-320, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof and they are both designed by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-M1 (16MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is very similar but the E-M1 (Four Thirds) and TG-320 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor measurements.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-M1 was brought out 22 months after the TG-320 making them a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera.

Before getting straight to a complete comparison, here is a short highlight of how the E-M1 scores against the TG-320 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Olympus TG-320

 E-M1 TG-320 
RevealedOctober 2013January 2012More modern by 22 months
Manual focus Dial exact focusing
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1037k230kSharper display (+807k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Olympus E-M1

 TG-320 E-M1 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 and Olympus TG-320

 E-M1 TG-320 
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen

Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 comes with exterior dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") along with a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-320 has sizing of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-M1 and Olympus TG-320 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the E-M1 versus the TG-320.

Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-320 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 and TG-320 is 71 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-320 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it can be hard to envision the gap between sensor sizes purely by reviewing specifications. The pic below may offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 and TG-320.

Plainly, the 2 cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 due to its larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M1 will offer greater detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 is going to have a benefit in sensor technology.

Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-320 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 Portrait photography advice
Olympus TG-320 Portrait photography advice
71
you can focus manually
high flash sync speed (1/320s)
good megapixels (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes face detection focus
supports RAW formats
33
decent MP (14MP)
supports face detection focusing
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
external flash not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 Street photography features
Olympus TG-320 Street photography features
78
screen tilts up and down
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
has touch to focus
environment proofing
lighter than average (497g)
great ISO range (25,600)
66
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
lighter than average (155 grams)
no articulating screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus TG-320 as a Sports photography camera
70
great max shutter speed (1/8,000s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good megapixels (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes tracking autofocus
environment proofing
has phase detect auto focus
not so great battery pack (350 shots)
40
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
weather proofing
slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
terrible battery power (150 CIPA)
lack of phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-M1
Travel photography with Olympus TG-320
65
lighter than average (497g)
environment proofing
has touch to focus
good megapixels (16MP)
not so great battery pack (350 shots)
does not have a selfie friendly display
67
lighter than average (155 grams)
weather proofing
decent MP (14MP)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
missing Timelapse mode
terrible battery power (150 CIPA)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus TG-320 Landscape photography highlights
73
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good megapixels (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
great ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW formats
environment proofing
not so great battery pack (350 per charge)
39
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14MP)
weather proofing
focusing manually not possible
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
no manual control
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
terrible battery power (150 per charge)
missing Timelapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 Vlogging factors
Olympus TG-320 Vlogging factors
36
touchscreen functionality
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
includes face detection focus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
has external mic support
lighter than average (497g)
does not have a selfie friendly display
32
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection focusing
lighter than average (155 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing external microphone support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 and Olympus TG-320
 Olympus OM-D E-M1Olympus TG-320
General Information
Make Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Olympus TG-320
Type Pro Mirrorless Waterproof
Introduced 2013-10-28 2012-01-10
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePIC VII TruePic III+
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 25600 1600
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 81 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-102mm (3.6x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.5-5.1
Macro focusing range - 3cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 2.7 inch
Screen resolution 1,037k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 10.0 frames per second 1.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 5.80 m
Flash options Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/320 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format H.264, Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 497g (1.10 lb) 155g (0.34 lb)
Physical dimensions 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 73 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.0 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.7 not tested
DXO Low light rating 757 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 images 150 images
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLN-1 LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots One One
Price at launch $799 $0