Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS
71 Imaging
52 Features
85 Overall
65
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/994ef/994ef7dee173aff9e3dc7d1b78984f0f0b8bbe9f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 front Olympus OM-D E-M1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41c7c/41c7c096f5b120d51cec7dfdff2b001e8780d88f" alt="Olympus TG-630 iHS front Olympus TG-630 iHS front"
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
- Announced October 2013
- New Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof and both are designed by Olympus. There is a significant difference among the resolutions of the E-M1 (16MP) and TG-630 iHS (12MP) and the E-M1 (Four Thirds) and TG-630 iHS (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-M1 was unveiled 10 months later than the TG-630 iHS and they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-630 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a simple summation of how the E-M1 grades against the TG-630 iHS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 and Olympus TG-630 iHS. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 Gallery and Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
E-M1 | TG-630 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | October 2013 | ![]() | January 2013 | Fresher by 10 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+577k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Olympus E-M1
TG-630 iHS | E-M1 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 and Olympus TG-630 iHS
E-M1 | TG-630 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera, you need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 comes with exterior dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") having a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-630 iHS has sizing of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you use at that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-M1 vs the TG-630 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/174f7/174f75f629283aa7f1c3e861ea96f593c22920a3" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS size comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 and TG-630 iHS is 71 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/347b9/347b9a6eb48be20e7badbeb2f0f4dd1348d32657" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizing purely by going through a spec sheet. The graphic underneath may give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 and TG-630 iHS.
Clearly, both cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 having a larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M1 will show more detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics far more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d16a3/d16a360c6af007c88cec0400ab7057d40c3d0b58" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/784ca/784ca6c2ddae55772fbfe976d0f2b7108cf07926" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Olympus TG-630 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Olympus TG-630 iHS |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Announced | 2013-10-28 | 2013-01-08 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePIC VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
Flash settings | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/320s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 497g (1.10 lbs) | 167g (0.37 lbs) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 757 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | 220 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLN-1 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $799 | $200 |