Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS200
71 Imaging
52 Features
85 Overall
65
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/994ef/994ef7dee173aff9e3dc7d1b78984f0f0b8bbe9f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 front Olympus OM-D E-M1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/408a9/408a9d2866582d16da93a6b808591f0e980025dc" alt="Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 front Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 front"
86 Imaging
53 Features
66 Overall
58
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
- Launched October 2013
- Updated by Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Announced February 2018
- Other Name is Lumix DC-TZ200
- Earlier Model is Panasonic ZS100
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview
Below is a in-depth assessment of the Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS200, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-M1 (16MP) and the ZS200 (20MP) is fairly similar but the E-M1 (Four Thirds) and ZS200 (1") boast totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-M1 was unveiled 5 years prior to the ZS200 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going into a complete comparison, here is a simple summary of how the E-M1 grades vs the ZS200 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS200 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 & Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 Gallery & Panasonic ZS200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Panasonic ZS200
E-M1 | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus E-M1
ZS200 | E-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2018 | ![]() | October 2013 | More recent by 52 months |
Display resolution | 1240k | ![]() | 1037k | Crisper display (+203k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 and Panasonic ZS200
E-M1 | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 offers exterior measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS200 has measurements of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") along with a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS200 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is a front view size comparison of the E-M1 and the ZS200.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b04c6/b04c659437072f95c691d2839267cec0bc05a77e" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS200 size comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS200 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 and ZS200 is 71 and 86 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47648/4764811de36f429ac63834da479fb339caf52f3f" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS200 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS200 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to envision the difference between sensor measurements simply by reviewing specifications. The visual underneath will help give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 and ZS200.
Plainly, both of those cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 with its larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Panasonic ZS200 will deliver more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images more aggressively. The older E-M1 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c12f/7c12f38f4a1555538b435affbabc83ba4fd5bd21" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS200 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS200 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aabf2/aabf26958f91c3a982505eb46dfe8e76f7702c56" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 |
Alternative name | - | Lumix DC-TZ200 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2013-10-28 | 2018-02-13 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePIC VII | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | MOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dot | 1,240 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 2,330 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/320s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 497 grams (1.10 pounds) | 340 grams (0.75 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 757 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | 370 shots |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $799 | $800 |