Clicky

Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS200

Portability
71
Imaging
53
Features
85
Overall
65
Olympus OM-D E-M1 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 front
Portability
86
Imaging
53
Features
66
Overall
58

Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
  • Launched October 2013
  • Updated by Olympus E-M1 II
Panasonic ZS200
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
  • 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
  • Announced February 2018
  • Other Name is Lumix DC-TZ200
  • Earlier Model is Panasonic ZS100
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview

Below is a in-depth assessment of the Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS200, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-M1 (16MP) and the ZS200 (20MP) is fairly similar but the E-M1 (Four Thirds) and ZS200 (1") boast totally different sensor dimensions.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-M1 was unveiled 5 years prior to the ZS200 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before going into a complete comparison, here is a simple summary of how the E-M1 grades vs the ZS200 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Panasonic ZS200

 E-M1 ZS200 
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display

Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus E-M1

 ZS200 E-M1 
AnnouncedFebruary 2018October 2013More recent by 52 months
Display resolution1240k1037kCrisper display (+203k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 and Panasonic ZS200

 E-M1 ZS200 
Focus manually Very exact focus
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display sizing
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch display Easily navigate

Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison

If you're looking to lug around your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 offers exterior measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS200 has measurements of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") along with a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS200 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is a front view size comparison of the E-M1 and the ZS200.

Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS200 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 and ZS200 is 71 and 86 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS200 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is very hard to envision the difference between sensor measurements simply by reviewing specifications. The visual underneath will help give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 and ZS200.

Plainly, both of those cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 with its larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Panasonic ZS200 will deliver more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images more aggressively. The older E-M1 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS200 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 Portrait photography info
Panasonic ZS200 Portrait photography info
71
focusing manually
flash sync speed is above average (1/320 seconds)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detect focusing
saves RAW formats
65
manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (1")
has face detection focusing
exports RAW files
no external flash support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 Street photography factors
Panasonic ZS200 Street photography factors
78
screen tilts up and down
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
supports touch to focus
weather sealing
lighter than competition (497 grams)
great ISO range (25,600)
77
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is good (1")
exports RAW files
features touch focus
fixed screen
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 Sports photography details
Panasonic ZS200 Sports photography details
70
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000 seconds)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers tracking focus
weather sealing
supports phase detect AF
low battery (350 per charge)
70
incredible zoom range (24-360mm 15.0 x zoom)
silent shooting (1/16,000s)
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
sensor size is good (1")
has tracking autofocus
better than average battery power (370 CIPA)
lacks phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 Travel photography info
Panasonic ZS200 Travel photography info
65
lighter than competition (497 grams)
weather sealing
supports touch to focus
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
low battery (350 shots)
screen is not selfie friendly
76
better than average battery power (370 per charge)
connects via bluetooth
features touch focus
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
built-in flash
really wide (24mm)
very long zoom (360mm)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.3)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 Landscape photography advice
Panasonic ZS200 Landscape photography advice
73
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
great ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW formats
weather sealing
low battery (350 per charge)
69
manual focus
really wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
sensor size is good (1")
exports RAW files
better than average battery power (370 per charge)
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 Vlogging advice
Panasonic ZS200 Vlogging advice
36
touchscreen enabled
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detect focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
comes with microphone support
lighter than competition (497g)
screen is not selfie friendly
35
really wide (24mm)
screen is touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection focusing
high res video (3840 x 2160 pixels)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
does not have external microphone jack
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 and Panasonic ZS200
 Olympus OM-D E-M1Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200
Alternative name - Lumix DC-TZ200
Category Pro Mirrorless Large Sensor Compact
Launched 2013-10-28 2018-02-13
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePIC VII Venus Engine
Sensor type CMOS MOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 20MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 5472 x 3648
Max native ISO 25600 12800
Max boosted ISO - 25600
Lowest native ISO 100 125
RAW format
Lowest boosted ISO - 80
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 81 49
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-360mm (15.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.3-6.4
Macro focus range - 5cm
Amount of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 2.7
Screen
Range of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 1,037 thousand dot 1,240 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot 2,330 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage 100% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x 0.53x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 60s
Highest shutter speed 1/8000s 1/2000s
Highest silent shutter speed - 1/16000s
Continuous shooting speed 10.0 frames/s 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range no built-in flash 6.80 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash modes Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/320s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) -
Max video resolution 1920x1080 3840x2160
Video format H.264, Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) Yes
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 497 grams (1.10 pounds) 340 grams (0.75 pounds)
Physical dimensions 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 73 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.0 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.7 not tested
DXO Low light score 757 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 shots 370 shots
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLN-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible)
Storage slots 1 1
Price at launch $799 $800