Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FH22
71 Imaging
52 Features
85 Overall
65
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/994ef/994ef7dee173aff9e3dc7d1b78984f0f0b8bbe9f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 front Olympus OM-D E-M1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7f2b/f7f2b938fbb5b27534c61aae91a2ae9f4e196796" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 front"
94 Imaging
36 Features
30 Overall
33
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FH22 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
- Revealed October 2013
- New Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 170g - 100 x 57 x 27mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-FS33
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FH22 Overview
Lets look much closer at the Olympus E-M1 and Panasonic FH22, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-M1 (16MP) and the FH22 (14MP) is pretty comparable but the E-M1 (Four Thirds) and FH22 (1/2.3") come with different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-M1 was revealed 3 years later than the FH22 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FH22 being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a complete comparison, below is a short summary of how the E-M1 matches up vs the FH22 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FH22 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 Gallery & Panasonic FH22 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Panasonic FH22
E-M1 | FH22 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | October 2013 | ![]() | January 2010 | Fresher by 47 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+807k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH22 over the Olympus E-M1
FH22 | E-M1 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 and Panasonic FH22
E-M1 | FH22 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FH22 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 has exterior measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") along with a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FH22 has sizing of 100mm x 57mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") with a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M1 and Panasonic FH22 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-M1 and the FH22.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/21fd7/21fd7eacf99d59a2be43c7fb5de8be811fc51382" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FH22 size comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FH22 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 and FH22 is 71 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7cd6/a7cd624236ef0815fe5fdbe06c941bd3329c6d6c" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FH22 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FH22 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FH22 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to picture the gap in sensor sizing merely by going through a spec sheet. The photograph here will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 and FH22.
As you can see, each of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M1 will show greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The newer E-M1 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9427/f9427b6c8891e9ba46a76cfe2208e76de42b2586" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FH22 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FH22 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FH22 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5bfbb/5bfbb9c93789c9a43dfda73e07879b5bce488043" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FH22 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FH22 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FH22 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 |
Also called | - | Lumix DMC-FS33 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2013-10-28 | 2010-01-06 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePIC VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 5.80 m |
Flash settings | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/320s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 497g (1.10 pounds) | 170g (0.37 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") | 100 x 57 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 757 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $799 | $200 |