Clicky

Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FS42

Portability
71
Imaging
53
Features
85
Overall
65
Olympus OM-D E-M1 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front
Portability
95
Imaging
33
Features
10
Overall
23

Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FS42 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
  • Released October 2013
  • Replacement is Olympus E-M1 II
Panasonic FS42
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1000 (Boost to 6400)
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
  • Introduced April 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FS42 Overview

Lets look a little more in depth at the Olympus E-M1 and Panasonic FS42, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the E-M1 (16MP) and FS42 (10MP) and the E-M1 (Four Thirds) and FS42 (1/2.5") have different sensor sizes.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-M1 was launched 4 years later than the FS42 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FS42 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before going into a full comparison, here is a brief overview of how the E-M1 grades versus the FS42 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Panasonic FS42

 E-M1 FS42 
IntroducedOctober 2013April 2009More recent by 56 months
Manual focus More accurate focusing
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display size3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution1037k230kClearer display (+807k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Olympus E-M1

 FS42 E-M1 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 and Panasonic FS42

 E-M1 FS42 
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen

Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FS42 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 enjoys outside dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") and a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs) and the Panasonic FS42 has specifications of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-M1 and Panasonic FS42 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the E-M1 against the FS42.

Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FS42 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 and FS42 is 71 and 95 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FS42 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FS42 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is very tough to picture the contrast in sensor measurements just by checking out a spec sheet. The graphic underneath should offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 and FS42.

As you can see, each of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 due to its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M1 will show greater detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The newer E-M1 should have an edge in sensor technology.

Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FS42 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 Portrait photography features
Panasonic FS42 Portrait photography features
71
you can focus manually
great flash sync speed (1/320s)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports face detection focus
delivers RAW formats
19
focusing manually not possible
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
MP count low (10 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.5")
lack of RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-M1
Street photography with Panasonic FS42
78
screen tilts
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
has focus via touch
environment sealing
lighter than competition (497g)
good high ISO (25,600)
47
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.5")
lack of RAW files
max ISO too low (1,000)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M1
Sports photography with Panasonic FS42
70
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000s)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports tracking autofocus
environment sealing
has phase detect auto focus
low battery life (350 per charge)
16
painfully slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.5")
lack of phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-M1
Travel photography with Panasonic FS42
65
lighter than competition (497g)
environment sealing
has focus via touch
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
low battery life (350 shots)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
51
built-in flash
lack of Timelapse function
MP count low (10MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (33mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-M1
Landscape photography with Panasonic FS42
73
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
good high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
environment sealing
low battery life (350 per charge)
22
focusing manually not possible
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (33mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inch)
no manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
small sensor (1/2.5")
max ISO too low (1,000)
lack of RAW files
lack of Timelapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 as a Vlogging camera
Panasonic FS42 as a Vlogging camera
36
touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
supports face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
has external microphone jack
lighter than competition (497g)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
22
wide angle not great (33mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of external microphone socket
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FS42 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 and Panasonic FS42
 Olympus OM-D E-M1Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42
Type Pro Mirrorless Ultracompact
Released 2013-10-28 2009-04-17
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePIC VII -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.5"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 5.744 x 4.308mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 24.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 10MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 25600 1000
Maximum enhanced ISO - 6400
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 81 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 33-132mm (4.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/2.8-5.9
Macro focus distance - 5cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 6.3
Screen
Type of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 2.5 inch
Resolution of screen 1,037 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 60s
Max shutter speed 1/8000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate 10.0 frames/s 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range no built-in flash 6.30 m
Flash modes Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/320s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video file format H.264, Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 497 grams (1.10 lbs) 132 grams (0.29 lbs)
Physical dimensions 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 73 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.0 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.7 not tested
DXO Low light score 757 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 shots -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model BLN-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots One One
Cost at release $799 $580