Clicky

Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FX75

Portability
71
Imaging
53
Features
85
Overall
65
Olympus OM-D E-M1 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
32
Overall
35

Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FX75 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
  • Released October 2013
  • Successor is Olympus E-M1 II
Panasonic FX75
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
  • 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
  • Announced June 2010
  • Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-FX70
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FX75 Overview

Below, we are comparing the Olympus E-M1 and Panasonic FX75, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-M1 (16MP) and the FX75 (14MP) is fairly comparable but the E-M1 (Four Thirds) and FX75 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor measurements.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-M1 was released 3 years later than the FX75 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FX75 being a Compact camera.

Before we go through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the E-M1 grades versus the FX75 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Panasonic FX75

 E-M1 FX75 
AnnouncedOctober 2013June 2010Fresher by 42 months
Focus manually More exact focusing
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1037k230kSharper display (+807k dot)

Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Olympus E-M1

 FX75 E-M1 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 and Panasonic FX75

 E-M1 FX75 
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FX75 Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to carry your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 enjoys physical measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs) while the Panasonic FX75 has measurements of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-M1 and Panasonic FX75 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use at that moment. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-M1 and the FX75.

Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FX75 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 and FX75 is 71 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FX75 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FX75 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it can be difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizing just by seeing a spec sheet. The photograph here may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 and FX75.

As you can see, both cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 featuring a larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M1 will show greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images much more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FX75 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 Portrait photography details
Panasonic FX75 Portrait photography details
71
has manual focus
high flash sync (1/320s)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports face detection autofocus
saves RAW files
28
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-M1
Street photography with Panasonic FX75
78
has a tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
comes with touch focus
environment proofing
lighter than competition in class (497g)
good high ISO (25,600)
62
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features focus by touch
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M1
Sports photography with Panasonic FX75
70
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000 seconds)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports tracking autofocus
environment proofing
comes with phase detect autofocus
terrible battery (350 shots)
39
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
offers tracking focus
painfully slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-M1
Travel photography with Panasonic FX75
65
lighter than competition in class (497 grams)
environment proofing
comes with touch focus
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
terrible battery (350 CIPA)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
67
features focus by touch
megapixel count decent (14MP)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (24mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
does not posses selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.2)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-M1
Landscape photography with Panasonic FX75
73
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
good high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW files
environment proofing
terrible battery (350 shots)
37
reasonably wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.2)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
manual mode not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M1
Vlogging with Panasonic FX75
36
touchscreen enabled
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
supports face detection autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does have external microphone jack
lighter than competition in class (497g)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
31
reasonably wide (24mm)
touchscreen functionality
built in image stabilization (Optical)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.2)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have mic socket
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FX75 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 and Panasonic FX75
 Olympus OM-D E-M1Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75
Other name - Lumix DMC-FX70
Class Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Released 2013-10-28 2010-06-01
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePIC VII Venus Engine HD II
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 4320 x 3240
Maximum native ISO 25600 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 81 -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-120mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/2.2-5.9
Macro focusing range - 3cm
Total lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.9
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 2.7 inches
Screen resolution 1,037 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 10.0fps 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 7.40 m
Flash modes Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/320 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format H.264, Motion JPEG AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 497g (1.10 lb) 165g (0.36 lb)
Dimensions 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 73 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.0 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.7 not tested
DXO Low light rating 757 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 images -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLN-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $799 $139