Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FZ200
71 Imaging
53 Features
85 Overall
65
65 Imaging
36 Features
64 Overall
47
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
- Released October 2013
- Later Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
- Revealed July 2012
- Replaced the Panasonic FZ100
- Refreshed by Panasonic FZ300
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview
The following is a extended comparison of the Olympus E-M1 and Panasonic FZ200, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a huge gap between the image resolutions of the E-M1 (16MP) and FZ200 (12MP) and the E-M1 (Four Thirds) and FZ200 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-M1 was revealed 16 months after the FZ200 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the E-M1 scores versus the FZ200 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FZ200 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 Gallery and Panasonic FZ200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Panasonic FZ200
E-M1 | FZ200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | October 2013 | July 2012 | Newer by 16 months | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 460k | Sharper display (+577k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Olympus E-M1
FZ200 | E-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 and Panasonic FZ200
E-M1 | FZ200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 has outer measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") with a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ200 has measurements of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") having a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M1 and Panasonic FZ200 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you use at that time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the E-M1 against the FZ200.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 and FZ200 is 71 and 65 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reading through technical specs. The pic below will provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 and FZ200.
As you have seen, both of the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 having a larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 will give you extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The younger E-M1 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2013-10-28 | 2012-07-18 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePIC VII | Venus Engine VII FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | - | Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 1,312 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 13.50 m |
Flash options | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/320s | 1/4000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 497 gr (1.10 lb) | 588 gr (1.30 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") | 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 73 | 37 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | 19.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.7 | 10.8 |
DXO Low light score | 757 | 114 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | 540 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $799 | $499 |