Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FZ300
71 Imaging
52 Features
85 Overall
65


59 Imaging
37 Features
73 Overall
51
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FZ300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
- Announced October 2013
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/16000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 691g - 132 x 92 x 117mm
- Announced July 2015
- Previous Model is Panasonic FZ200

Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FZ300 Overview
The following is a in-depth overview of the Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FZ300, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the E-M1 (16MP) and FZ300 (12MP) and the E-M1 (Four Thirds) and FZ300 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor measurements.

The E-M1 was brought out 20 months earlier than the FZ300 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving through a detailed comparison, below is a short introduction of how the E-M1 grades against the FZ300 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FZ300 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 Gallery & Panasonic FZ300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Panasonic FZ300
E-M1 | FZ300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ300 over the Olympus E-M1
FZ300 | E-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2015 | ![]() | October 2013 | Newer by 20 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 1037k | Crisper screen (+3k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 and Panasonic FZ300
E-M1 | FZ300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FZ300 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 features exterior dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ300 has dimensions of 132mm x 92mm x 117mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 4.6") with a weight of 691 grams (1.52 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FZ300 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the E-M1 and the FZ300.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 and FZ300 is 71 and 59 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FZ300 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture below might provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 and FZ300.
Clearly, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 due to its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 will offer greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots far more aggressively. The more aged E-M1 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FZ300 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FZ300 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2013-10-28 | 2015-07-16 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePIC VII | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 1,440 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 8.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, forced on, forced on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, forced off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/320s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 497g (1.10 lbs) | 691g (1.52 lbs) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") | 132 x 92 x 117mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 4.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 757 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | 380 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $799 | $598 |