Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FZ35
71 Imaging
53 Features
85 Overall
65
72 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FZ35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
- Introduced October 2013
- Replacement is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-486mm (F2.8-4.4) lens
- 397g - 118 x 76 x 89mm
- Introduced July 2010
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-FZ38
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FZ35 Overview
Below, we are comparing the Olympus E-M1 and Panasonic FZ35, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the E-M1 (16MP) and FZ35 (12MP) and the E-M1 (Four Thirds) and FZ35 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-M1 was launched 3 years after the FZ35 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ35 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving through a thorough comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the E-M1 matches up versus the FZ35 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FZ35 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 Gallery and Panasonic FZ35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Panasonic FZ35
E-M1 | FZ35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | October 2013 | July 2010 | More modern by 41 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 230k | Crisper display (+807k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ35 over the Olympus E-M1
FZ35 | E-M1 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 and Panasonic FZ35
E-M1 | FZ35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FZ35 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 has got outside measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") having a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ35 has specifications of 118mm x 76mm x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") and a weight of 397 grams (0.88 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M1 and Panasonic FZ35 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is the front view size comparison of the E-M1 against the FZ35.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 and FZ35 is 71 and 72 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FZ35 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to envision the gap between sensor sizes simply by going over technical specs. The image underneath should give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 and FZ35.
As you can tell, the two cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 featuring a larger sensor will make getting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 will deliver extra detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FZ35 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 |
Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-FZ38 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2013-10-28 | 2010-07-06 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePIC VII | Venus Engine V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 27-486mm (18.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-4.4 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,037k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 8.50 m |
Flash options | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/320 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 497g (1.10 lb) | 397g (0.88 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") | 118 x 76 x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 757 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures)) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $799 | $999 |