Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS10
71 Imaging
52 Features
85 Overall
65
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/994ef/994ef7dee173aff9e3dc7d1b78984f0f0b8bbe9f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 front Olympus OM-D E-M1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/807b0/807b089857a251fd5fc82ebc6238512c0fcc02c9" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 front"
91 Imaging
37 Features
46 Overall
40
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
- Released October 2013
- Replacement is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-384mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 219g - 105 x 58 x 33mm
- Revealed January 2011
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ20 / Lumix DMC-TZ22
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS10 Overview
Following is a comprehensive comparison of the Olympus E-M1 versus Panasonic ZS10, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-M1 (16MP) and the ZS10 (14MP) is pretty close but the E-M1 (Four Thirds) and ZS10 (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-M1 was launched 2 years after the ZS10 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS10 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a thorough comparison, here is a brief summation of how the E-M1 grades vs the ZS10 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS10 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 Gallery and Panasonic ZS10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Panasonic ZS10
E-M1 | ZS10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | October 2013 | ![]() | January 2011 | More modern by 34 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+577k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS10 over the Olympus E-M1
ZS10 | E-M1 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 and Panasonic ZS10
E-M1 | ZS10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS10 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera, you have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 offers exterior measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS10 has sizing of 105mm x 58mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 219 grams (0.48 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M1 versus Panasonic ZS10 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M1 versus the ZS10.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e67e9/e67e9c0dd2bd9dc21853486e8dfe6b5d564db81d" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS10 size comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS10 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 and ZS10 is 71 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ed50c/ed50c70cb1abcf6bd4a37b440aa1794746bd181b" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS10 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS10 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS10 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes simply by looking through a spec sheet. The pic below should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 and ZS10.
As you can see, the 2 cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 will render greater detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The newer E-M1 provides an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e7b7a/e7b7a034b5428e55278be2908857bfdda72849ea" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS10 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS10 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS10 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43288/4328845dd2c0a9a428405caf19b27b8150dfd0de" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS10 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 |
Alternate name | - | Lumix DMC-TZ20 / Lumix DMC-TZ22 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2013-10-28 | 2011-01-25 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePIC VII | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-384mm (16.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.00 m |
Flash modes | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/320s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 497 gr (1.10 lbs) | 219 gr (0.48 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") | 105 x 58 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 757 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | 260 shots |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $799 | $350 |