Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS45
71 Imaging
52 Features
85 Overall
65
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/994ef/994ef7dee173aff9e3dc7d1b78984f0f0b8bbe9f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 front Olympus OM-D E-M1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc9/47cc9bc94afeaa31cc3dde1b811c34d098a7d562" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45 front"
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS45 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
- Announced October 2013
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 249g - 108 x 60 x 32mm
- Launched January 2015
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-TZ57
- Replaced the Panasonic ZS40
- Later Model is Panasonic ZS50
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS45 Overview
Following is a in depth assessment of the Olympus E-M1 versus Panasonic ZS45, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-M1 (16MP) and the ZS45 (16MP) is fairly well matched but the E-M1 (Four Thirds) and ZS45 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-M1 was unveiled 14 months before the ZS45 making the cameras a generation away from one another. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS45 being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick summary of how the E-M1 scores against the ZS45 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS45 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 Gallery & Panasonic ZS45 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Panasonic ZS45
E-M1 | ZS45 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS45 over the Olympus E-M1
ZS45 | E-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2015 | ![]() | October 2013 | More modern by 14 months |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 1037k | Sharper display (+3k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 and Panasonic ZS45
E-M1 | ZS45 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS45 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 comes with exterior measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") along with a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS45 has sizing of 108mm x 60mm x 32mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M1 versus Panasonic ZS45 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the E-M1 versus the ZS45.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92267/922670b3f90bc516031a89f2b5340d42a5911a0f" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS45 size comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS45 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 and ZS45 is 71 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48058/480588a1b701050780dd551e113eb3e3ad9fa207" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS45 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS45 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS45 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to see the contrast between sensor sizes purely by looking at technical specs. The pic underneath might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 and ZS45.
As you can tell, each of these cameras offer the same exact megapixels but not the same sensor sizes. The E-M1 offers the larger sensor which should make getting shallow DOF less difficult. The more aged E-M1 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0d63f/0d63fd16db629a4ae112ef9d346062c3f188dfb0" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS45 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS45 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS45 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76b0f/76b0f63fe5be42178bf997f5f33b77979e5958e7" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS45 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS45 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic ZS45 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ57 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2013-10-28 | 2015-01-06 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePIC VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 21 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 6.00 m |
Flash modes | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/320s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 497 grams (1.10 lb) | 249 grams (0.55 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") | 108 x 60 x 32mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 757 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 350 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $799 | $300 |