Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax K-500
71 Imaging
52 Features
85 Overall
65
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/994ef/994ef7dee173aff9e3dc7d1b78984f0f0b8bbe9f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 front Olympus OM-D E-M1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7664a/7664a04951cdb8a34b9dfe4c6285125ada24205c" alt="Pentax K-500 front Pentax K-500 front"
64 Imaging
58 Features
70 Overall
62
Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax K-500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
- Announced October 2013
- Updated by Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 51600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 646g - 130 x 97 x 71mm
- Launched November 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax K-500 Overview
The following is a comprehensive overview of the Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax K-500, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the E-M1 (16MP) and the K-500 (16MP) is very comparable but the E-M1 (Four Thirds) and K-500 (APS-C) possess different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-M1 was unveiled at a similar time to the K-500 so they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K-500 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting straight into a complete comparison, below is a quick summation of how the E-M1 scores versus the K-500 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax K-500 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 & Pentax K-500. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 Gallery & Pentax K-500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Pentax K-500
E-M1 | K-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 921k | Clearer display (+116k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-500 over the Olympus E-M1
K-500 | E-M1 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 and Pentax K-500
E-M1 | K-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | October 2013 | ![]() | November 2013 | Same age |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax K-500 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 has outside measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") along with a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs) whilst the Pentax K-500 has sizing of 130mm x 97mm x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 646 grams (1.42 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax K-500 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-M1 versus the K-500.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55f4a/55f4ad86d5af44ac7cc5d2aef9f1d9d9332503f1" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax K-500 size comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax K-500 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 and K-500 is 71 and 64 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0864d/0864d7517c7a3b2e45dfc4c076852559bdac25f8" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax K-500 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax K-500 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax K-500 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to picture the gap in sensor dimensions simply by checking out specifications. The pic here may give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 and K-500.
To sum up, the two cameras offer the same exact megapixels but different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 offers the smaller sensor which will make obtaining bokeh tougher.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9a7c/e9a7c07c867d2efef17969962d31eb4e4e42148e" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax K-500 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax K-500 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax K-500 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62c30/62c30afd93e8d75437702733c8ddd8bed2e74bc5" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax K-500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax K-500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax K-500 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Pentax K-500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Pentax K-500 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2013-10-28 | 2013-11-27 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePIC VII | PRIME M |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4928 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 51600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 11 |
Cross focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Total lenses | 107 | 151 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD monitor with brightness/color adjustment and AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.61x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/6000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per second | 6.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync, Slow Sync+Redeye, Trailing Curtain Sync, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/320s | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30,25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60,50,30,25,24 fps), 640 x 424 (30,25,24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 497 gr (1.10 lb) | 646 gr (1.42 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") | 130 x 97 x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 73 | 79 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.7 | 13.1 |
DXO Low light score | 757 | 1087 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | 710 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | AA |
Battery model | BLN-1 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $799 | $600 |