Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax RS1500
71 Imaging
52 Features
85 Overall
65
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/994ef/994ef7dee173aff9e3dc7d1b78984f0f0b8bbe9f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 front Olympus OM-D E-M1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce1de/ce1defc693d186d489caa9ba163f0305eaf354f0" alt="Pentax Optio RS1500 front Pentax Optio RS1500 front"
93 Imaging
37 Features
30 Overall
34
Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax RS1500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
- Announced October 2013
- Renewed by Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-110mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 157g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Released March 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax RS1500 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax RS1500, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Pentax. The resolution of the E-M1 (16MP) and the RS1500 (14MP) is relatively similar but the E-M1 (Four Thirds) and RS1500 (1/2.3") have different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-M1 was announced 2 years later than the RS1500 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax RS1500 being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a complete comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the E-M1 scores against the RS1500 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax RS1500 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 and Pentax Optio RS1500. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 Gallery and Pentax RS1500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Pentax RS1500
E-M1 | RS1500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | October 2013 | ![]() | March 2011 | Fresher by 32 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax RS1500 over the Olympus E-M1
RS1500 | E-M1 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 and Pentax RS1500
E-M1 | RS1500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax RS1500 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 features exterior dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") and a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs) and the Pentax RS1500 has sizing of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 157 grams (0.35 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax RS1500 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using at the time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M1 vs the RS1500.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d146/8d1469b8f6f75c13447cf2451ff30326b1942190" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax RS1500 size comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax RS1500 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 and RS1500 is 71 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c7ef/7c7ef8c39eadbed2dcc1cb7220c45b63afb42848" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax RS1500 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax RS1500 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax RS1500 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizing simply by going over specs. The photograph underneath might provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 and RS1500.
All in all, both the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 having a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 will deliver more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots way more aggressively. The newer E-M1 provides an edge in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1fca2/1fca2e2fcc842076b8388245fd55679be293ef3b" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax RS1500 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax RS1500 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax RS1500 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/28e6c/28e6c06ae02eb5e9bc4cd1a7dcf8abc2d566f7a3" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax RS1500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax RS1500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax RS1500 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Pentax Optio RS1500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Pentax Optio RS1500 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2013-10-28 | 2011-03-16 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePIC VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-110mm (3.9x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 1,037k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | - | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.90 m |
Flash options | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/320 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 497g (1.10 lbs) | 157g (0.35 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 757 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | 260 shots |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLN-1 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $799 | $150 |