Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax WG-2
71 Imaging
52 Features
85 Overall
65
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/994ef/994ef7dee173aff9e3dc7d1b78984f0f0b8bbe9f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 front Olympus OM-D E-M1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/53f79/53f79318b036268028db17024c8c792be3aa6f4f" alt="Pentax Optio WG-2 front Pentax Optio WG-2 front"
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax WG-2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
- Released October 2013
- Renewed by Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Announced February 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax WG-2 Overview
Following is a in-depth assessment of the Olympus E-M1 versus Pentax WG-2, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the E-M1 (16MP) and the WG-2 (16MP) is relatively comparable but the E-M1 (Four Thirds) and WG-2 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-M1 was announced 21 months after the WG-2 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax WG-2 being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief summary of how the E-M1 matches up vs the WG-2 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax WG-2 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 and Pentax Optio WG-2. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 Gallery and Pentax WG-2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Pentax WG-2
E-M1 | WG-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | October 2013 | ![]() | February 2012 | More modern by 21 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+577k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 over the Olympus E-M1
WG-2 | E-M1 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 and Pentax WG-2
E-M1 | WG-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax WG-2 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 has got external measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") and a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs) whilst the Pentax WG-2 has proportions of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M1 versus Pentax WG-2 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the E-M1 against the WG-2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb237/eb237a2da331427b240c884429322960c21c0c07" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax WG-2 size comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax WG-2 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 and WG-2 is 71 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e573/9e573b839b7ab5f44c0d097ab4263654da9697a2" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax WG-2 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax WG-2 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax WG-2 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to see the gap in sensor sizes simply by going through technical specs. The pic underneath will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 and WG-2.
As you have seen, both of the cameras have got the exact same megapixels albeit not the same sensor sizes. The E-M1 contains the bigger sensor which will make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult. The newer E-M1 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d281/8d2816351c942e0609f47f57856e9f9528ed2a52" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax WG-2 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax WG-2 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax WG-2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9dc85/9dc850f486b78167d07855e8e384e290d655bb63" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax WG-2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax WG-2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax WG-2 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Pentax Optio WG-2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Pentax Optio WG-2 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Released | 2013-10-28 | 2012-02-07 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePIC VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 5.40 m |
Flash modes | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/320 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 497 grams (1.10 pounds) | 192 grams (0.42 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 757 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | 260 images |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $799 | $350 |