Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax Q7
71 Imaging
52 Features
85 Overall
65
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/994ef/994ef7dee173aff9e3dc7d1b78984f0f0b8bbe9f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 front Olympus OM-D E-M1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff182/ff18240782b3e81fef5b6699b11da2b99c864ba8" alt="Pentax Q7 front Pentax Q7 front"
92 Imaging
37 Features
54 Overall
43
Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax Q7 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
- Announced October 2013
- Updated by Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 200g - 102 x 58 x 34mm
- Released August 2013
- Succeeded the Pentax Q10
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax Q7 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-M1 and Pentax Q7, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the E-M1 (16MP) and Q7 (12MP) and the E-M1 (Four Thirds) and Q7 (1/1.7") possess totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-M1 was unveiled 3 months after the Q7 so they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax Q7 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting in to a more detailed comparison, below is a short view of how the E-M1 scores against the Q7 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax Q7 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 & Pentax Q7. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 Gallery & Pentax Q7 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Pentax Q7
E-M1 | Q7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+577k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax Q7 over the Olympus E-M1
Q7 | E-M1 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 and Pentax Q7
E-M1 | Q7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | October 2013 | ![]() | August 2013 | Same age |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax Q7 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 provides exterior dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") along with a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs) whilst the Pentax Q7 has proportions of 102mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 200 grams (0.44 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M1 and Pentax Q7 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using at that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-M1 compared to the Q7.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5489/b548909250d31457b38ea3b75f106cae181a316f" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax Q7 size comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax Q7 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 and Q7 is 71 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/56139/5613940f3667df170f6fb7e28b9751580c8b6b68" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax Q7 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax Q7 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax Q7 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to envision the gap in sensor sizes simply by checking out specs. The picture underneath should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 and Q7.
All in all, both of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 having a bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 will show greater detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures much more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee912/ee912ff388bc5bc7b1f340c1aa8882dbc6111649" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax Q7 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax Q7 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax Q7 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a948/5a948bbf409072f69fcfdd7ad1351c3515e2efdf" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax Q7 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax Q7 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax Q7 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Pentax Q7 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Pentax Q7 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2013-10-28 | 2013-08-08 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePIC VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 81 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax Q |
Number of lenses | 107 | 8 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD monitor, wide angle viewing, AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.90 m (ISO100/m) |
Flash options | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual | P-TTL, Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Trailing Curtain Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/320 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | FullHD(1920x1080, 30fps/25fps/24fps), HD(1280x720,16:9,30fps/25fps/24fps), VGA(640x480,4:3,30fps/25fps/24fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 497 gr (1.10 lb) | 200 gr (0.44 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") | 102 x 58 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 757 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | 250 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | D-LI68 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (12 sec, 2 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC and Eye-Fi Card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $799 | $480 |