Clicky

Olympus E-M1 vs Samsung HZ35W

Portability
71
Imaging
52
Features
85
Overall
65
Olympus OM-D E-M1 front
 
Samsung HZ35W front
Portability
91
Imaging
35
Features
42
Overall
37

Olympus E-M1 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs

Olympus E-M1
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
  • Launched October 2013
  • Updated by Olympus E-M1 II
Samsung HZ35W
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
  • Launched June 2010
  • Additionally Known as WB650
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-M1 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview

Below, we are evaluating the Olympus E-M1 vs Samsung HZ35W, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 (16MP) and HZ35W (12MP) and the E-M1 (Four Thirds) and HZ35W (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor sizes.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The E-M1 was manufactured 3 years later than the HZ35W and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera.

Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the E-M1 matches up against the HZ35W with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Samsung HZ35W

 E-M1 HZ35W 
LaunchedOctober 2013June 2010Fresher by 41 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution1037k614kClearer display (+423k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Olympus E-M1

 HZ35W E-M1 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 and Samsung HZ35W

 E-M1 HZ35W 
Manual focus More exact focusing
Display dimension3"3"Identical display dimensions
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen

Olympus E-M1 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 enjoys outside measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") and a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ35W has specifications of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-M1 vs Samsung HZ35W in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have at that moment. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the E-M1 compared to the HZ35W.

Olympus E-M1 vs Samsung HZ35W size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 and HZ35W is 71 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 vs Samsung HZ35W top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison

Normally, its hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizing purely by viewing technical specs. The photograph here may give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 and HZ35W.

As you can tell, both the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 featuring a larger sensor will make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 will render extra detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images much more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 is going to have an edge in sensor technology.

Olympus E-M1 vs Samsung HZ35W sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung HZ35W as a Portrait photography camera
71
focusing manually
flash sync speed is above average (1/320s)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
offers face detect focusing
supports RAW formats
34
manual focus
features face detection focusing
can't use external flash
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 Street photography details
Samsung HZ35W Street photography details
77
screen tilts
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
provides focus via touch
environment proof
lighter than competition in class (497 grams)
very good ISO range (25,600)
60
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors (245g)
no articulating screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 Sports photography factors
Samsung HZ35W Sports photography factors
69
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000 seconds)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
offers tracking focus
environment proof
comes with phase detect AF
not so great battery pack (350 CIPA)
42
excellent zoom range (24-360mm 15.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
features tracking autofocus
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 Travel photography details
Samsung HZ35W Travel photography details
65
lighter than competition in class (497 grams)
environment proof
provides focus via touch
megapixel count decent (16MP)
not so great battery pack (350 CIPA)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
63
lighter than competitors (245 grams)
has built in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
very long reach (360mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
does not offer selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f3.2)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-M1
Landscape photography with Samsung HZ35W
72
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
very good ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW formats
environment proof
not so great battery pack (350 per charge)
43
manual focus
relatively wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
does not have Time Lapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 Vlogging information
Samsung HZ35W Vlogging information
36
touchscreen functionality
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detect focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
does have microphone port
lighter than competition in class (497 grams)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
31
relatively wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
features face detection focusing
lighter than competitors (245g)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
does not offer selfie friendly display
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have external mic support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M1 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 and Samsung HZ35W
 Olympus OM-D E-M1Samsung HZ35W
General Information
Brand Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Samsung HZ35W
Also called as - WB650
Category Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2013-10-28 2010-06-16
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePIC VII -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 25600 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 81 -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-360mm (15.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.2-5.8
Macro focusing range - 3cm
Amount of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Tilting Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 1,037k dots 614k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 16 secs
Max shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 10.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 5.00 m
Flash modes Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/320 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format H.264, Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 497 gr (1.10 pounds) 245 gr (0.54 pounds)
Dimensions 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 73 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.0 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.7 not tested
DXO Low light rating 757 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 photographs -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLN-1 SLB-11A
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Retail cost $799 $300