Olympus E-M1 vs Samsung HZ50W
71 Imaging
52 Features
85 Overall
65
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/994ef/994ef7dee173aff9e3dc7d1b78984f0f0b8bbe9f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 front Olympus OM-D E-M1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4f52/d4f52e39beb092353224512dc646b19cc509cfae" alt="Samsung HZ50W front Samsung HZ50W front"
70 Imaging
37 Features
44 Overall
39
Olympus E-M1 vs Samsung HZ50W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
- Announced October 2013
- Replacement is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 426g - 116 x 83 x 91mm
- Launched May 2010
- Alternate Name is WB5500
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Samsung HZ50W Overview
Below, we are comparing the Olympus E-M1 versus Samsung HZ50W, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the E-M1 (16MP) and the HZ50W (14MP) is fairly comparable but the E-M1 (Four Thirds) and HZ50W (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-M1 was released 3 years after the HZ50W which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung HZ50W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving in to a full comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the E-M1 grades vs the HZ50W when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Samsung HZ50W Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 and Samsung HZ50W. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 Gallery and Samsung HZ50W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Samsung HZ50W
E-M1 | HZ50W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | October 2013 | ![]() | May 2010 | More modern by 43 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+807k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ50W over the Olympus E-M1
HZ50W | E-M1 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 and Samsung HZ50W
E-M1 | HZ50W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-M1 vs Samsung HZ50W Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 features outer measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") with a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs) while the Samsung HZ50W has dimensions of 116mm x 83mm x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") having a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M1 versus Samsung HZ50W in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the E-M1 vs the HZ50W.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8b0b/a8b0bfef7ef7422e6aba76e36e76d29689cc6653" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Samsung HZ50W size comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Samsung HZ50W size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 and HZ50W is 71 and 70 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df5de/df5de9e9758d15c4c885f90744a680e7eb7ecd9d" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Samsung HZ50W top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Samsung HZ50W top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 vs Samsung HZ50W Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes just by going through specifications. The picture here will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 and HZ50W.
Plainly, both of those cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 will provide more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics much more aggressively. The newer E-M1 should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a527b/a527b5201886b5ca13632552b47319699b8e3c0c" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Samsung HZ50W sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Samsung HZ50W sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/493e9/493e9ad7b14ae5ee04bf207e3612d92ad3f00ce3" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Samsung HZ50W Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Samsung HZ50W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Samsung HZ50W |
Also Known as | - | WB5500 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2013-10-28 | 2010-05-03 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePIC VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-676mm (26.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.0 |
Macro focus distance | - | 10cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 16 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.60 m |
Flash modes | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/320 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 497g (1.10 lbs) | 426g (0.94 lbs) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") | 116 x 83 x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 757 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLN-1 | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $799 | $250 |