Olympus E-M1 vs Samsung NX3000
71 Imaging
52 Features
85 Overall
65
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/994ef/994ef7dee173aff9e3dc7d1b78984f0f0b8bbe9f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 front Olympus OM-D E-M1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de65b/de65bfe186e39934ff695656a2380e8b4549eaed" alt="Samsung NX3000 front Samsung NX3000 front"
89 Imaging
63 Features
62 Overall
62
Olympus E-M1 vs Samsung NX3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
- Released October 2013
- Replacement is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 230g - 117 x 66 x 39mm
- Released May 2014
- Succeeded the Samsung NX2000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Samsung NX3000 Overview
Here is a extended overview of the Olympus E-M1 versus Samsung NX3000, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the E-M1 (16MP) and the NX3000 (20MP) is fairly similar but the E-M1 (Four Thirds) and NX3000 (APS-C) have totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-M1 was introduced 7 months earlier than the NX3000 and they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung NX3000 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-M1 grades against the NX3000 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Samsung NX3000 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 & Samsung NX3000. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 Gallery & Samsung NX3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Samsung NX3000
E-M1 | NX3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 461k | Crisper display (+576k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX3000 over the Olympus E-M1
NX3000 | E-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | May 2014 | ![]() | October 2013 | Fresher by 7 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 and Samsung NX3000
E-M1 | NX3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus E-M1 vs Samsung NX3000 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 features external measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") and a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs) and the Samsung NX3000 has sizing of 117mm x 66mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M1 versus Samsung NX3000 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the E-M1 against the NX3000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/599a2/599a2a9a9fa60eafbb2938d74fd3726cda50f5cf" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Samsung NX3000 size comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Samsung NX3000 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 and NX3000 is 71 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1cf6/c1cf6e4a68ad3869a1a1881f0c655f991479e33d" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Samsung NX3000 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Samsung NX3000 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 vs Samsung NX3000 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizing merely by reading technical specs. The visual below will help give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 and NX3000.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 using its tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field tougher and the Samsung NX3000 will offer more detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The older E-M1 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a39d3/a39d3e257e2d0b4e9e39ee390a5023fdcd21743a" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Samsung NX3000 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Samsung NX3000 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 vs Samsung NX3000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8718/a8718cc66e70dc992994dc1a383de9f97f9a155f" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Samsung NX3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Samsung NX3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Samsung NX3000 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Samsung NX3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Samsung NX3000 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2013-10-28 | 2014-05-26 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePIC VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 35 |
Cross focus points | - | 1 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Samsung NX |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dots | 461 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/320 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 497 gr (1.10 lb) | 230 gr (0.51 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") | 117 x 66 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 757 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 370 photos |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLN-1 | B740 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2-30 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $799 | $897 |