Olympus E-M1 vs Sony A99 II
71 Imaging
53 Features
85 Overall
65
57 Imaging
77 Features
92 Overall
83
Olympus E-M1 vs Sony A99 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
- Revealed October 2013
- Successor is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 42MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Bump to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 849g - 143 x 104 x 76mm
- Announced September 2016
- Replaced the Sony A99
Olympus E-M1 vs Sony A99 II Overview
Following is a complete analysis of the Olympus E-M1 versus Sony A99 II, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 (16MP) and A99 II (42MP) and the E-M1 (Four Thirds) and A99 II (Full frame) boast different sensor size.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-M1 was launched 3 years before the A99 II which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A99 II being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the E-M1 grades against the A99 II in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M1 vs Sony A99 II Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 and Sony Alpha A99 II. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 Gallery and Sony A99 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Sony A99 II
E-M1 | A99 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A99 II over the Olympus E-M1
A99 II | E-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2016 | October 2013 | More modern by 35 months | |
Screen type | Fully articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1229k | 1037k | Crisper screen (+192k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 and Sony A99 II
E-M1 | A99 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen size |
Olympus E-M1 vs Sony A99 II Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 has exterior measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") along with a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs) whilst the Sony A99 II has sizing of 143mm x 104mm x 76mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 849 grams (1.87 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M1 versus Sony A99 II in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use at that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the E-M1 vs the A99 II.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 and A99 II is 71 and 57 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 vs Sony A99 II Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizes only by reading through specs. The picture here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 and A99 II.
All in all, both the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 due to its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF more difficult and the Sony A99 II will give greater detail utilizing its extra 26MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged E-M1 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1 vs Sony A99 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 vs Sony A99 II Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Sony Alpha A99 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Sony Alpha A99 II |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced DSLR |
Revealed | 2013-10-28 | 2016-09-19 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePIC VII | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 42 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 7952 x 5304 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 102400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 399 |
Cross focus points | - | 79 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Available lenses | 107 | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fully articulated |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,037k dots | 1,229k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | 12.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, redeye reduction, rear sync, high-speed sync, wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/320 secs | 1/250 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 497 gr (1.10 pounds) | 849 gr (1.87 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") | 143 x 104 x 76mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 73 | 92 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | 25.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.7 | 13.4 |
DXO Low light score | 757 | 2317 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | 490 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | NP-FM500H lithium-ion battery & charger |
Battery model | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC/MS Duo slots |
Card slots | One | Two |
Launch pricing | $799 | $3,198 |