Olympus E-M1 vs Sony A330
71 Imaging
52 Features
85 Overall
65
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/994ef/994ef7dee173aff9e3dc7d1b78984f0f0b8bbe9f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 front Olympus OM-D E-M1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b299f/b299f5a5afefcfe28ea9cd44a81dc7ccf61def89" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A330 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A330 front"
67 Imaging
50 Features
50 Overall
50
Olympus E-M1 vs Sony A330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
- Announced October 2013
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 529g - 128 x 97 x 71mm
- Introduced May 2009
- Previous Model is Sony A300
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Sony A330 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Olympus E-M1 versus Sony A330, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a crucial difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 (16MP) and A330 (10MP) and the E-M1 (Four Thirds) and A330 (APS-C) boast totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-M1 was released 4 years after the A330 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A330 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going right into a thorough comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the E-M1 grades versus the A330 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Sony A330 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A330. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 Gallery and Sony A330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Sony A330
E-M1 | A330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | October 2013 | ![]() | May 2009 | Newer by 55 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A330 over the Olympus E-M1
A330 | E-M1 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 and Sony A330
E-M1 | A330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-M1 vs Sony A330 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 features exterior dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") with a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs) while the Sony A330 has specifications of 128mm x 97mm x 71mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.8") and a weight of 529 grams (1.17 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M1 versus Sony A330 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are working with during that time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the E-M1 compared to the A330.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d850d/d850d4dab8a2d42fd4d640811a35835989e7fd12" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Sony A330 size comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Sony A330 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 and A330 is 71 and 67 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e316b/e316bcca51c7ef8b3ce3feef547fd92acd4be1c7" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Sony A330 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Sony A330 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 vs Sony A330 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to see the gap in sensor dimensions purely by seeing specs. The pic below should provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 and A330.
All in all, both of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 due to its smaller sensor will make getting bokeh more challenging and the Olympus E-M1 will show more detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63a23/63a23f95cbbd5e33a5eecb49ee80e637369d5815" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Sony A330 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Sony A330 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 vs Sony A330 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e8ea6/e8ea6925f3f68313dc2c98592d5d2168bb6083f6" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Sony A330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Sony A330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Sony A330 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A330 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A330 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2013-10-28 | 2009-05-18 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePIC VII | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3872 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Available lenses | 107 | 143 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 10.00 m |
Flash settings | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/320s | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 497g (1.10 lbs) | 529g (1.17 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") | 128 x 97 x 71mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 73 | 64 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.0 | 22.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.7 | 11.5 |
DXO Low light rating | 757 | 535 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | 230 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $799 | $545 |