Olympus E-M1 vs Sony H55
71 Imaging
53 Features
85 Overall
65
92 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
Olympus E-M1 vs Sony H55 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
- Released October 2013
- Renewed by Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 200g - 103 x 58 x 29mm
- Released June 2010
Olympus E-M1 vs Sony H55 Overview
Following is a extended overview of the Olympus E-M1 and Sony H55, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-M1 (16MP) and the H55 (14MP) is fairly well matched but the E-M1 (Four Thirds) and H55 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-M1 was introduced 3 years after the H55 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony H55 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a short introduction of how the E-M1 grades versus the H55 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M1 vs Sony H55 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 Gallery & Sony H55 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Sony H55
E-M1 | H55 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | October 2013 | June 2010 | More modern by 41 months | |
Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 230k | Clearer display (+807k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony H55 over the Olympus E-M1
H55 | E-M1 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 and Sony H55
E-M1 | H55 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-M1 vs Sony H55 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 features exterior measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") along with a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs) and the Sony H55 has specifications of 103mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 200 grams (0.44 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M1 and Sony H55 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the E-M1 against the H55.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 and H55 is 71 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 vs Sony H55 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to see the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reading through technical specs. The image here should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 and H55.
As you can tell, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 having a larger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M1 will give you greater detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will help you crop photos far more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1 vs Sony H55 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 vs Sony H55 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2013-10-28 | 2010-06-16 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePIC VII | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.80 m |
Flash settings | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Slow Syncro, Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/320s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 497g (1.10 lbs) | 200g (0.44 lbs) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") | 103 x 58 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 757 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLN-1 | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo/ PRO HG-Duo, SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $799 | $235 |