Olympus E-M1 vs Sony RX10 IV
71 Imaging
52 Features
85 Overall
65
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/994ef/994ef7dee173aff9e3dc7d1b78984f0f0b8bbe9f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 front Olympus OM-D E-M1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e636d/e636d6d773338e71588b03217805acb83fb0b161" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV front"
52 Imaging
53 Features
82 Overall
64
Olympus E-M1 vs Sony RX10 IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
- Revealed October 2013
- Successor is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
- 1095g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Launched September 2017
- Previous Model is Sony RX10 III
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Sony RX10 IV Overview
The following is a extended analysis of the Olympus E-M1 versus Sony RX10 IV, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-M1 (16MP) and the RX10 IV (20MP) is very close but the E-M1 (Four Thirds) and RX10 IV (1") have totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-M1 was unveiled 4 years prior to the RX10 IV which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony RX10 IV being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a simple overview of how the E-M1 scores vs the RX10 IV with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Sony RX10 IV Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 Gallery & Sony RX10 IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Sony RX10 IV
E-M1 | RX10 IV |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 IV over the Olympus E-M1
RX10 IV | E-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2017 | ![]() | October 2013 | Newer by 47 months |
Display resolution | 1440k | ![]() | 1037k | Sharper display (+403k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 and Sony RX10 IV
E-M1 | RX10 IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M1 vs Sony RX10 IV Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 has got external dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") and a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs) whilst the Sony RX10 IV has specifications of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") accompanied by a weight of 1095 grams (2.41 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M1 versus Sony RX10 IV in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the E-M1 compared to the RX10 IV.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/39eae/39eaea748de3f6202e2fb3a678493de2a5525b48" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Sony RX10 IV size comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Sony RX10 IV size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 and RX10 IV is 71 and 52 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b7c8/6b7c8742113324124fb5752e12404011bdf4a7bc" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Sony RX10 IV top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Sony RX10 IV top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 vs Sony RX10 IV Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to see the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by viewing specs. The image underneath should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 and RX10 IV.
As you can plainly see, both cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 with its larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Sony RX10 IV will result in greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-M1 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7c57/b7c57b2bbe51747e7ba9916fb8ca98ac80a0c79d" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Sony RX10 IV sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Sony RX10 IV sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 vs Sony RX10 IV Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d176/2d176cdd2a51d07c535d02186c2413f5d65750ea" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Sony RX10 IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Sony RX10 IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Sony RX10 IV Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2013-10-28 | 2017-09-12 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePIC VII | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 315 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-600mm (25.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.4-4.0 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,037k dots | 1,440k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Highest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per second | 24.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 10.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/320 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 497 gr (1.10 lb) | 1095 gr (2.41 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 757 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | 400 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLN-1 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $799 | $1,698 |