Olympus E-M1 vs Sony TX55
71 Imaging
52 Features
85 Overall
65
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/994ef/994ef7dee173aff9e3dc7d1b78984f0f0b8bbe9f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 front Olympus OM-D E-M1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0df57/0df57386a92a29a8ea4fb2397b2d66a2f1701a23" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55 front"
97 Imaging
39 Features
46 Overall
41
Olympus E-M1 vs Sony TX55 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
- Released October 2013
- Updated by Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 109g - 93 x 54 x 13mm
- Announced July 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Sony TX55 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Olympus E-M1 versus Sony TX55, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-M1 (16MP) and the TX55 (16MP) is relatively close but the E-M1 (Four Thirds) and TX55 (1/2.3") offer different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-M1 was brought out 2 years after the TX55 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony TX55 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving into a in depth comparison, here is a short view of how the E-M1 scores versus the TX55 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Sony TX55 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 Gallery & Sony TX55 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Sony TX55
E-M1 | TX55 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | October 2013 | ![]() | July 2011 | More modern by 28 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Sony TX55 over the Olympus E-M1
TX55 | E-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3.3" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 1037k | Clearer screen (+193k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 and Sony TX55
E-M1 | TX55 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M1 vs Sony TX55 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera often, you have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 has external dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") and a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs) and the Sony TX55 has measurements of 93mm x 54mm x 13mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.5") and a weight of 109 grams (0.24 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M1 versus Sony TX55 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M1 and the TX55.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa769/fa769113fb3382a8c930dc84effb54a15f8a7e4c" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Sony TX55 size comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Sony TX55 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 and TX55 is 71 and 97 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d842/3d842d1cd7e7889b3371b9221806ebbb56664951" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Sony TX55 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Sony TX55 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 vs Sony TX55 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes purely by looking through technical specs. The pic below may offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 and TX55.
As you can tell, the two cameras come with the identical megapixels albeit different sensor sizes. The E-M1 has got the bigger sensor which will make obtaining shallow DOF less difficult. The more modern E-M1 provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/889f4/889f48d42b0e091991005b307f1be2049c71a10f" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Sony TX55 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Sony TX55 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 vs Sony TX55 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2eb68/2eb683f20f99d3a85df69a004d9688b1b3b6b067" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Sony TX55 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Sony TX55 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Sony TX55 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Released | 2013-10-28 | 2011-07-24 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePIC VII | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3.3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,037k dots | 1,230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | - | XtraFine OLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.70 m |
Flash options | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/320s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 497 gr (1.10 pounds) | 109 gr (0.24 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") | 93 x 54 x 13mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 757 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 250 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLN-1 | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/SDHC, Memory Stick Micro |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $799 | $350 |