Olympus E-M1 vs Sony W320
71 Imaging
52 Features
85 Overall
65
97 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Olympus E-M1 vs Sony W320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
- Revealed October 2013
- Replacement is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
- Launched January 2010
Olympus E-M1 vs Sony W320 Overview
Below is a thorough assessment of the Olympus E-M1 and Sony W320, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the E-M1 (16MP) and the W320 (14MP) is pretty similar but the E-M1 (Four Thirds) and W320 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-M1 was introduced 3 years later than the W320 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony W320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the E-M1 scores vs the W320 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M1 vs Sony W320 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 Gallery & Sony W320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Sony W320
E-M1 | W320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | October 2013 | January 2010 | More recent by 47 months | |
Manual focus | More exact focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 230k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Olympus E-M1
W320 | E-M1 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 and Sony W320
E-M1 | W320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus E-M1 vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 comes with physical measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") and a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs) while the Sony W320 has measurements of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") and a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M1 and Sony W320 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the E-M1 vs the W320.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 and W320 is 71 and 97 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to see the contrast between sensor measurements purely by reading technical specs. The graphic underneath may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 and W320.
As you can tell, the two cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 using its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M1 will offer greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots a little more aggressively. The younger E-M1 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M1 vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 vs Sony W320 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2013-10-28 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePIC VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.7-5.7 |
Macro focus range | - | 4cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 1 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.80 m |
Flash modes | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/320 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 497 grams (1.10 lbs) | 117 grams (0.26 lbs) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") | 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 757 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLN-1 | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $799 | $269 |