Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-M10 III
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-M10 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Introduced August 2015
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10
- Successor is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Launched August 2017
- Old Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- Later Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-M10 III Overview
Following is a extended comparison of the Olympus E-M10 II versus Olympus E-M10 III, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras and they are both created by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the E-M10 III (16MP) is relatively similar and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizes (Four Thirds).
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-M10 II was brought out 24 months prior to the E-M10 III which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before going straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a short view of how the E-M10 II matches up vs the E-M10 III when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-M10 III Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Olympus E-M10 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus E-M10 III
E-M10 II | E-M10 III |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Olympus E-M10 II
E-M10 III | E-M10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2017 | August 2015 | More modern by 24 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus E-M10 III
E-M10 II | E-M10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 1040k | Identical screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-M10 III Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 II provides exterior measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Olympus E-M10 III has dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M10 II versus Olympus E-M10 III in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you choose at the time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the E-M10 II against the E-M10 III.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 II and E-M10 III is 82 and 80 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-M10 III Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizes only by going over technical specs. The image here might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 II and E-M10 III.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the identical megapixels and you should expect similar quality of images however you will need to factor the production date of the products into consideration. The more aged E-M10 II is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-M10 III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-M10 III Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2015-08-25 | 2017-08-31 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 107 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.62x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0fps | 8.6fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 390 gr (0.86 lb) | 410 gr (0.90 lb) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 shots | 330 shots |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | BLS-50 |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $499 | $650 |