Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-PL3
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62c3c/62c3ce44298b85880cf33d759daf3251ff32053c" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/610d2/610d2f0194f11ebae752e41542b4ece0dd0a12f2" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL3 front Olympus PEN E-PL3 front"
88 Imaging
48 Features
52 Overall
49
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-PL3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Announced August 2015
- Old Model is Olympus E-M10
- New Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 313g - 110 x 64 x 37mm
- Launched September 2011
- Replaced the Olympus E-PL2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-PL3 Overview
Here is a complete analysis of the Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-PL3, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras and they are both built by Olympus. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and E-PL3 (12MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizes (Four Thirds).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-M10 II was introduced 3 years later than the E-PL3 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-PL3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short introduction of how the E-M10 II grades against the E-PL3 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-PL3 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Olympus PEN E-PL3. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Olympus E-PL3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus E-PL3
E-M10 II | E-PL3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2015 | ![]() | September 2011 | Fresher by 48 months |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+580k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL3 over the Olympus E-M10 II
E-PL3 | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus E-PL3
E-M10 II | E-PL3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-PL3 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 II has got physical measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-PL3 has dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") along with a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-PL3 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the E-M10 II against the E-PL3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3bde0/3bde070160e955ccba981daaf5d185c115fc87fb" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-PL3 size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-PL3 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 II and E-PL3 is 82 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ed3c4/ed3c44dfe64c9c605248edf4b32f9527a04d10a7" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-PL3 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-PL3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-PL3 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizing merely by going over a spec sheet. The photograph below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 II and E-PL3.
As you can see, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You should anticipate the Olympus E-M10 II to offer you more detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The younger E-M10 II should have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36b6c/36b6c3dd9a9b9d39811d30d9713dc72dcb56b77b" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-PL3 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-PL3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-PL3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/587bf/587bfbbece23f024d49d001192a15c5ace8196e3" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-PL3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-PL3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-PL3 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus PEN E-PL3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus PEN E-PL3 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2015-08-25 | 2011-09-20 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | Truepic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4032 x 3024 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 107 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0fps | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 390g (0.86 lb) | 313g (0.69 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 110 x 64 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 73 | 52 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | 20.9 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | 10.3 |
DXO Low light score | 842 | 499 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 images | 300 images |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $499 | $399 |