Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-PM1
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
89 Imaging
48 Features
52 Overall
49
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-PM1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Announced August 2015
- Older Model is Olympus E-M10
- Replacement is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 265g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Introduced November 2011
- Successor is Olympus E-PM2
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-PM1 Overview
In this article, we are reviewing the Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-PM1, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras and both are created by Olympus. There exists a crucial gap among the resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and E-PM1 (12MP) but they feature the same exact sensor sizes (Four Thirds).
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-M10 II was introduced 3 years later than the E-PM1 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-PM1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the E-M10 II matches up versus the E-PM1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-PM1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Olympus PEN E-PM1. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Olympus E-PM1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus E-PM1
E-M10 II | E-PM1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2015 | November 2011 | More recent by 46 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 460k | Sharper display (+580k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM1 over the Olympus E-M10 II
E-PM1 | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus E-PM1
E-M10 II | E-PM1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-PM1 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 II has external measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-PM1 has measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 265 grams (0.58 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-PM1 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the E-M10 II versus the E-PM1.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 II and E-PM1 is 82 and 89 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-PM1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to picture the contrast in sensor measurements just by checking out technical specs. The graphic underneath will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 II and E-PM1.
As you have seen, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You should anticipate the Olympus E-M10 II to show extra detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a little more aggressively. The newer E-M10 II provides an edge in sensor technology.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-PM1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-PM1 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus PEN E-PM1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus PEN E-PM1 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2015-08-25 | 2011-11-23 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4032 x 3024 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 107 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 1,040k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | - | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0fps | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 390g (0.86 pounds) | 265g (0.58 pounds) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 73 | 52 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | 21.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | 10.3 |
DXO Low light rating | 842 | 499 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 shots | 330 shots |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $499 | $499 |