Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-565UZ
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62c3c/62c3ce44298b85880cf33d759daf3251ff32053c" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be5cc/be5cc451a0cb5e5cd135984cda3377e059d9849e" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ front Olympus SP-565UZ front"
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Released August 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10
- Successor is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Announced January 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview
The following is a in depth assessment of the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus SP-565UZ, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are created by Olympus. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and SP-565UZ (10MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and SP-565UZ (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-M10 II was manufactured 6 years after the SP-565UZ which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a in-depth comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the E-M10 II grades against the SP-565UZ with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Olympus SP-565UZ. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus SP-565UZ
E-M10 II | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2015 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 81 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Olympus E-M10 II
SP-565UZ | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus SP-565UZ
E-M10 II | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 II features outside measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") and a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-565UZ has measurements of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus SP-565UZ in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have during that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the E-M10 II against the SP-565UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4ca5b/4ca5b3fe6d8920b66e89384004bdd1774a4104b5" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 II and SP-565UZ is 82 and 72 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0235/f023533e40a31a53c0d7632c604548edee650f1d" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to see the gap in sensor dimensions just by checking out specs. The pic below might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 II and SP-565UZ.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 II because of its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M10 II will produce more detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots far more aggressively. The younger E-M10 II will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a175/3a175f13b2dbbe8483259e21c3d8b2b182098bd1" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e8a5/1e8a57120b4432fe2a460cf16235e38488bc09ab" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus SP-565UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus SP-565UZ |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2015-08-25 | 2009-01-15 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW files | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-520mm (20.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.5" |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 1s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 6.40 m (ISO 200) |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 390 grams (0.86 lbs) | 413 grams (0.91 lbs) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 73 | 30 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | 18.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | 10.1 |
DXO Low light score | 842 | 68 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photographs | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-50 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $499 | $400 |