Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-600 UZ
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62c3c/62c3ce44298b85880cf33d759daf3251ff32053c" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a542/5a54204eab4a88c3bca57f82f94873880adeaa4d" alt="Olympus SP-600 UZ front Olympus SP-600 UZ front"
69 Imaging
35 Features
27 Overall
31
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Launched August 2015
- Old Model is Olympus E-M10
- Successor is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-420mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Succeeded the Olympus SP-590 UZ
- Renewed by Olympus SP-610UZ
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Overview
The following is a extended assessment of the Olympus E-M10 II versus Olympus SP-600 UZ, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are sold by Olympus. There is a significant difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and SP-600 UZ (12MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and SP-600 UZ (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-M10 II was announced 5 years after the SP-600 UZ which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-600 UZ being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-M10 II matches up versus the SP-600 UZ in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Olympus SP-600 UZ. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Olympus SP-600 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus SP-600 UZ
E-M10 II | SP-600 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2015 | ![]() | February 2010 | Newer by 68 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+810k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-600 UZ over the Olympus E-M10 II
SP-600 UZ | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus SP-600 UZ
E-M10 II | SP-600 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 II comes with outer dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") and a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-600 UZ has specifications of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M10 II versus Olympus SP-600 UZ in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the E-M10 II and the SP-600 UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60824/6082408f75817771753c62244d63632666874eac" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-600 UZ size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-600 UZ size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 II and SP-600 UZ is 82 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6bd65/6bd65966952619a76a268ae305776cccbfeb499e" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-600 UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-600 UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to envision the gap in sensor dimensions purely by checking out a spec sheet. The image underneath might give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 II and SP-600 UZ.
As you can see, each of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 II with its larger sensor will make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 II will provide extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images way more aggressively. The newer E-M10 II will have a benefit in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/35a60/35a60c6d2e3dc7fa7a6048c12ba9bbdfb49829b3" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-600 UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-600 UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0942/a09428e1625ef7286e4a91dc86f31f687219e6ab" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus SP-600 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus SP-600 UZ |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2015-08-25 | 2010-02-02 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-420mm (15.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-5.4 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 1/2s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 3.10 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 390g (0.86 lb) | 455g (1.00 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 pictures | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $499 | $189 |