Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-810 UZ
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62c3c/62c3ce44298b85880cf33d759daf3251ff32053c" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0063/e00637e5677671b8b72fa1976b25d95bb3a79c37" alt="Olympus SP-810 UZ front Olympus SP-810 UZ front"
78 Imaging
37 Features
34 Overall
35
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Launched August 2015
- Replaced the Olympus E-M10
- New Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-864mm (F2.9-5.7) lens
- 413g - 106 x 76 x 74mm
- Announced July 2011
- Succeeded the Olympus SP-800 UZ
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus SP-810 UZ, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are designed by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the SP-810 UZ (14MP) is very comparable but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and SP-810 UZ (1/2.3") have different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-M10 II was unveiled 4 years later than the SP-810 UZ and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-810 UZ being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting right into a in depth comparison, here is a short summation of how the E-M10 II matches up versus the SP-810 UZ with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Olympus SP-810 UZ. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Olympus SP-810 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus SP-810 UZ
E-M10 II | SP-810 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2015 | ![]() | July 2011 | More recent by 50 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+810k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-810 UZ over the Olympus E-M10 II
SP-810 UZ | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus SP-810 UZ
E-M10 II | SP-810 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 II enjoys exterior dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") and a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Olympus SP-810 UZ has specifications of 106mm x 76mm x 74mm (4.2" x 3.0" x 2.9") having a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus SP-810 UZ in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M10 II compared to the SP-810 UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca5aa/ca5aa0058233311d06bced357388237511458835" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-810 UZ size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-810 UZ size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 II and SP-810 UZ is 82 and 78 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8819a/8819ad1e47937ddc2ea9d03d5ef3382debdce061" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-810 UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-810 UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to imagine the difference in sensor measurements merely by going through a spec sheet. The visual underneath might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 II and SP-810 UZ.
As you can see, both of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 II having a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M10 II will produce more detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images more aggressively. The younger E-M10 II provides an edge in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c939f/c939fb8d3b3f8cc50bbdfce3712221fcd0b8b9fc" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-810 UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-810 UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96cee/96ceee37a82b3e6b6f06bf010af409d67a77e739" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus SP-810 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus SP-810 UZ |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2015-08-25 | 2011-07-27 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-864mm (36.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.9-5.7 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 1/4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1200s |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames/s | 0.7 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 6.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 390g (0.86 lbs) | 413g (0.91 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 106 x 76 x 74mm (4.2" x 3.0" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 shots | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-50 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $499 | $280 |