Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SZ-10
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
90 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SZ-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Released August 2015
- Superseded the Olympus E-M10
- New Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-504mm (F3.1-4.4) lens
- 215g - 106 x 67 x 38mm
- Launched February 2011
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SZ-10 Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus SZ-10, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both manufactured by Olympus. The resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the SZ-10 (14MP) is very comparable but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and SZ-10 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-M10 II was unveiled 4 years later than the SZ-10 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SZ-10 being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a in depth comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the E-M10 II grades versus the SZ-10 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SZ-10 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II & Olympus SZ-10. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery & Olympus SZ-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus SZ-10
E-M10 II | SZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2015 | February 2011 | Fresher by 56 months | |
Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 460k | Crisper display (+580k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-10 over the Olympus E-M10 II
SZ-10 | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus SZ-10
E-M10 II | SZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display size | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SZ-10 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 II has got physical measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Olympus SZ-10 has proportions of 106mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.5") and a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus SZ-10 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the E-M10 II and the SZ-10.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 II and SZ-10 is 82 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SZ-10 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizing just by going through specs. The visual here should give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 II and SZ-10.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 II with its larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 II will show extra detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics much more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 II is going to have a benefit in sensor technology.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SZ-10 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus SZ-10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus SZ-10 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2015-08-25 | 2011-02-08 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-504mm (18.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.1-4.4 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 7.10 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 390 gr (0.86 lbs) | 215 gr (0.47 lbs) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 106 x 67 x 38mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 images | 220 images |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $499 | $300 |