Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
89 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Announced August 2015
- Old Model is Olympus E-M10
- New Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 108 x 70 x 40mm
- Revealed January 2013
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Overview
In this article, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are designed by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the SZ-16 iHS (16MP) is relatively comparable but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and SZ-16 iHS (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor sizes.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-M10 II was launched 2 years later than the SZ-16 iHS and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SZ-16 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a short view of how the E-M10 II matches up vs the SZ-16 iHS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Olympus SZ-16 iHS. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Olympus SZ-16 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus SZ-16 iHS
E-M10 II | SZ-16 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2015 | January 2013 | More recent by 32 months | |
Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 460k | Crisper screen (+580k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-16 iHS over the Olympus E-M10 II
SZ-16 iHS | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus SZ-16 iHS
E-M10 II | SZ-16 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 II has got exterior measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") along with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Olympus SZ-16 iHS has sizing of 108mm x 70mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select during that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the E-M10 II versus the SZ-16 iHS.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 II and SZ-16 iHS is 82 and 89 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, its hard to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements purely by going through specifications. The graphic here may give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 II and SZ-16 iHS.
Plainly, each of the cameras offer the same exact megapixels albeit not the same sensor measurements. The E-M10 II offers the bigger sensor which should make getting bokeh simpler. The more modern E-M10 II will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus SZ-16 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus SZ-16 iHS |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2015-08-25 | 2013-01-08 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.0-6.9 |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 1,040k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 390 gr (0.86 pounds) | 226 gr (0.50 pounds) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 108 x 70 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photographs | 220 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $499 | $230 |