Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 5010
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
96 Imaging
36 Features
27 Overall
32
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 5010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Announced August 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10
- Replacement is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 126g - 95 x 56 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Additionally Known as mju 5010
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 5010 Overview
Here is a extensive review of the Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 5010, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Ultracompact and both of them are sold by Olympus. The resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the 5010 (14MP) is pretty comparable but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and 5010 (1/2.3") feature different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-M10 II was announced 5 years later than the 5010 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus 5010 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the E-M10 II grades against the 5010 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 5010 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Olympus Stylus 5010. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Olympus 5010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus 5010
E-M10 II | 5010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2015 | January 2010 | Fresher by 69 months | |
Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Clearer screen (+810k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus 5010 over the Olympus E-M10 II
5010 | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus 5010
E-M10 II | 5010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 5010 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 II offers external measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") along with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Olympus 5010 has measurements of 95mm x 56mm x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 126 grams (0.28 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 5010 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the E-M10 II compared to the 5010.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 II and 5010 is 82 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 5010 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to imagine the gap in sensor sizing only by seeing technical specs. The photograph underneath may give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 II and 5010.
As you can tell, each of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 II using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh simpler and the Olympus E-M10 II will show extra detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 II should have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 5010 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 5010 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus Stylus 5010 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus Stylus 5010 |
Alternative name | - | mju 5010 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2015-08-25 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 7cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 4.70 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 390 grams (0.86 pounds) | 126 grams (0.28 pounds) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 95 x 56 x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photographs | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-50 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $499 | $150 |