Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 9000
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Released August 2015
- Old Model is Olympus E-M10
- Renewed by Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced May 2009
- Alternative Name is mju 9000
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 9000 Overview
Here is a complete review of the Olympus E-M10 II versus Olympus 9000, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are produced by Olympus. There is a huge difference among the image resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and 9000 (12MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and 9000 (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-M10 II was released 6 years later than the 9000 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a in depth comparison, below is a short overview of how the E-M10 II grades against the 9000 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 9000 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Olympus Stylus 9000. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Olympus 9000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus 9000
E-M10 II | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2015 | May 2009 | Fresher by 77 months | |
Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Sharper screen (+810k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Olympus E-M10 II
9000 | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus 9000
E-M10 II | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 II offers external measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") along with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Olympus 9000 has proportions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M10 II versus Olympus 9000 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-M10 II versus the 9000.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 II and 9000 is 82 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to picture the contrast in sensor sizing only by checking out specifications. The visual underneath should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 II and 9000.
To sum up, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 II due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh simpler and the Olympus E-M10 II will provide extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 II should have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 9000 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus Stylus 9000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
Also called as | - | mju 9000 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2015-08-25 | 2009-05-14 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 50 |
RAW images | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.2-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 1,040k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 5.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 390g (0.86 lb) | 225g (0.50 lb) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 images | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $499 | $300 |