Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus Tough-3000
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62c3c/62c3ce44298b85880cf33d759daf3251ff32053c" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65bd8/65bd8807760d1aa9ce571a27b6fa183cf36228ef" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Announced August 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Additionally referred to as mju Tough 3000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus Tough-3000, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof and they are both manufactured by Olympus. There is a crucial difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and Tough-3000 (12MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and Tough-3000 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-M10 II was announced 5 years after the Tough-3000 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a quick summation of how the E-M10 II scores versus the Tough-3000 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus Tough-3000
E-M10 II | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2015 | ![]() | January 2010 | Newer by 69 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+810k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Olympus E-M10 II
Tough-3000 | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus Tough-3000
E-M10 II | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 II has got outside measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Olympus Tough-3000 has proportions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus Tough-3000 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose at the time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the E-M10 II versus the Tough-3000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dcfa8/dcfa88afe826b04e6c1fc3f740d3b8b7b74c7518" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 II and Tough-3000 is 82 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/639b1/639b1221b3d33bd82870daa287968410dc09d59f" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to see the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reading through technical specs. The image here will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 II and Tough-3000.
As you can tell, both of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 II having a larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M10 II will give you more detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics far more aggressively. The more recent E-M10 II will have an advantage in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33398/33398e35e5b0e1f853eb59770f860604a0428835" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/598c2/598c24c98f84c7af3932773c07f4f654a617a014" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
Other name | - | mju Tough 3000 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Announced | 2015-08-25 | 2010-01-07 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW data | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 2cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 4.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 390g (0.86 lb) | 159g (0.35 lb) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $499 | $0 |