Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 6000
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62c3c/62c3ce44298b85880cf33d759daf3251ff32053c" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9387/c9387039ab5c223fcc36ca8de7fbd3b8f5516027" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 front Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 front"
94 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 6000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Released August 2015
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 6000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 6000 Overview
Lets look much closer at the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus 6000, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both offered by Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and 6000 (10MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and 6000 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-M10 II was revealed 6 years later than the 6000 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus 6000 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise overview of how the E-M10 II grades against the 6000 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 6000 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II & Olympus Stylus Tough 6000. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery & Olympus 6000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus 6000
E-M10 II | 6000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2015 | ![]() | July 2009 | More recent by 75 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+810k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6000 over the Olympus E-M10 II
6000 | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus 6000
E-M10 II | 6000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 6000 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 II provides outside dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") and a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Olympus 6000 has dimensions of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus 6000 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. The following is the front view size comparison of the E-M10 II and the 6000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1539/a15395b88273329ff74552a6de2a5010be883f60" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 6000 size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 6000 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 II and 6000 is 82 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ed19c/ed19cd3c868dec109e2f8ca148e4a37bee9b560b" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 6000 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 6000 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 6000 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to see the contrast in sensor measurements simply by checking out technical specs. The photograph below may give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 II and 6000.
As you can tell, the two cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 II having a larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 II will produce greater detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics far more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 II is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/215fa/215faeaa64fd27fe47d387b8075020281360b394" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 6000 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 6000 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 6000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1e5a/f1e5a76fb95f3af262bccbd368d8ffc4e192aace" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 6000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 6000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 6000 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 |
Also called | - | mju Tough 6000 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2015-08-25 | 2009-07-01 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 50 |
RAW images | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 2cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 1/4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 390 gr (0.86 lb) | 179 gr (0.39 lb) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 pictures | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $499 | $259 |