Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 8010
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62c3c/62c3ce44298b85880cf33d759daf3251ff32053c" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80c39/80c393637c7e1700b3dbd116480a434b8bf25baf" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 front Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 front"
92 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 8010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Introduced August 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 8010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 8010 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-M10 II versus Olympus 8010, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof and both are created by Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and 8010 (13MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and 8010 (1/2.3") feature different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-M10 II was manufactured 5 years later than the 8010 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus 8010 being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a concise overview of how the E-M10 II scores vs the 8010 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 8010 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II & Olympus Stylus Tough 8010. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery & Olympus 8010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus 8010
E-M10 II | 8010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2015 | ![]() | February 2010 | Fresher by 68 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Olympus E-M10 II
8010 | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus 8010
E-M10 II | 8010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 8010 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 II has got external measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") along with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Olympus 8010 has measurements of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M10 II versus Olympus 8010 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have at that moment. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the E-M10 II versus the 8010.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78dff/78dffc4d294efafdd43c4ab58934ed04aa58bea1" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 8010 size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 8010 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 II and 8010 is 82 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6a68/f6a68f7d420518d738289cde6a2c74762c9f7a2e" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 8010 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 8010 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 8010 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing simply by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic here will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 II and 8010.
Clearly, each of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 II featuring a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 II will provide you with extra detail due to its extra 3MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 II provides an edge in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0c522/0c5222459ded932c0401515c5ad5c545b910fb1c" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 8010 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 8010 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 8010 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0769d/0769de1e62ae7897f704e18e9f22da1c29b6c695" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 8010 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 8010 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 8010 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 |
Also called | - | mju Tough 8010 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2015-08-25 | 2010-02-02 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 1/4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 4.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 390 grams (0.86 pounds) | 245 grams (0.54 pounds) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photographs | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-50 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $499 | $600 |