Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-870
82 Imaging
53 Features
77 Overall
62
91 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-870 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Revealed August 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Expand to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Announced January 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-860
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-870 Overview
On this page, we are looking at the Olympus E-M10 II versus Olympus TG-870, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Ultracompact and both of them are produced by Olympus. The resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the TG-870 (16MP) is very comparable but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and TG-870 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-M10 II was unveiled 4 months before the TG-870 which means that they are both of a similar age. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the E-M10 II scores versus the TG-870 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-870 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery & Olympus TG-870 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus TG-870
| E-M10 II | TG-870 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial precise focus | |||
| Display resolution | 1040k | 921k | Crisper display (+119k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Olympus E-M10 II
| TG-870 | E-M10 II |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus TG-870
| E-M10 II | TG-870 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2015 | January 2016 | Same age | |
| Display type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display size | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-870 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera, you will want to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 II enjoys outside measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Olympus TG-870 has proportions of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M10 II versus Olympus TG-870 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at the time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M10 II and the TG-870.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 II and TG-870 is 82 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-870 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to envision the contrast in sensor measurements just by checking out specifications. The photograph underneath will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 II and TG-870.
Plainly, both of those cameras have the same resolution but not the same sensor measurements. The E-M10 II offers the larger sensor which should make obtaining bokeh easier.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-870 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2015-08-25 | 2016-01-06 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VII | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 81 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Number of lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 1,040k dots | 921k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames per second | 7.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 390 gr (0.86 pounds) | 221 gr (0.49 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 73 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 842 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 photos | 300 photos |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLS-50 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $499 | $280 |