Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-870
82 Imaging
53 Features
77 Overall
62
91 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-870 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Revealed August 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Expand to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Announced January 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-860
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-870 Overview
On this page, we are looking at the Olympus E-M10 II versus Olympus TG-870, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Ultracompact and both of them are produced by Olympus. The resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the TG-870 (16MP) is very comparable but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and TG-870 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-M10 II was unveiled 4 months before the TG-870 which means that they are both of a similar age. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the E-M10 II scores versus the TG-870 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-870 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery & Olympus TG-870 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus TG-870
| E-M10 II | TG-870 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial precise focus | |||
| Display resolution | 1040k | 921k | Crisper display (+119k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Olympus E-M10 II
| TG-870 | E-M10 II |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus TG-870
| E-M10 II | TG-870 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2015 | January 2016 | Same age | |
| Display type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display size | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-870 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera, you will want to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 II enjoys outside measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Olympus TG-870 has proportions of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M10 II versus Olympus TG-870 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at the time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M10 II and the TG-870.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 II and TG-870 is 82 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-870 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to envision the contrast in sensor measurements just by checking out specifications. The photograph underneath will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 II and TG-870.
Plainly, both of those cameras have the same resolution but not the same sensor measurements. The E-M10 II offers the larger sensor which should make obtaining bokeh easier.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-870 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2015-08-25 | 2016-01-06 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VII | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 81 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Number of lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 1,040k dots | 921k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames per second | 7.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 390 gr (0.86 pounds) | 221 gr (0.49 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 73 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 842 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 photos | 300 photos |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLS-50 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $499 | $280 |