Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-870
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62c3c/62c3ce44298b85880cf33d759daf3251ff32053c" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98cb4/98cb42e909dff8452621d79a82a9f24270e5e01f" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front"
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-870 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Revealed August 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Expand to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Announced January 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-860
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-870 Overview
On this page, we are looking at the Olympus E-M10 II versus Olympus TG-870, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Ultracompact and both of them are produced by Olympus. The resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the TG-870 (16MP) is very comparable but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and TG-870 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-M10 II was unveiled 4 months before the TG-870 which means that they are both of a similar age. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the E-M10 II scores versus the TG-870 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-870 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery & Olympus TG-870 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus TG-870
E-M10 II | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 921k | Crisper display (+119k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Olympus E-M10 II
TG-870 | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus TG-870
E-M10 II | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2015 | ![]() | January 2016 | Same age |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-870 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera, you will want to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 II enjoys outside measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Olympus TG-870 has proportions of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M10 II versus Olympus TG-870 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at the time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M10 II and the TG-870.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b33d4/b33d44518b6d2a2190499a51941360892caf8c26" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-870 size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-870 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 II and TG-870 is 82 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61cdf/61cdf23256eda8d395109f2920323222f9318050" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-870 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-870 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-870 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to envision the contrast in sensor measurements just by checking out specifications. The photograph underneath will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 II and TG-870.
Plainly, both of those cameras have the same resolution but not the same sensor measurements. The E-M10 II offers the larger sensor which should make obtaining bokeh easier.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2552f/2552f4ca80c8e2eb7d45ca16ef5c10fc47033ce8" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-870 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-870 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2505c/2505c6776ec60864e2a47ea556a23075e01eeba4" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-870 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2015-08-25 | 2016-01-06 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames per second | 7.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 390 gr (0.86 pounds) | 221 gr (0.49 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | 300 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $499 | $280 |