Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus XZ-10
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus XZ-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Released August 2015
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Launched January 2013
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus XZ-10 Overview
Following is a in-depth review of the Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus XZ-10, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both sold by Olympus. There is a sizeable difference among the resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and XZ-10 (12MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and XZ-10 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-M10 II was introduced 2 years after the XZ-10 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a in-depth comparison, here is a short highlight of how the E-M10 II matches up vs the XZ-10 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus XZ-10 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Olympus Stylus XZ-10. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Olympus XZ-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus XZ-10
E-M10 II | XZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2015 | January 2013 | More modern by 32 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 920k | Crisper display (+120k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Olympus E-M10 II
XZ-10 | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus XZ-10
E-M10 II | XZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus XZ-10 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 II has outer measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-10 has dimensions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus XZ-10 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M10 II vs the XZ-10.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 II and XZ-10 is 82 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus XZ-10 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to envision the gap in sensor sizes merely by going through specifications. The image here should offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 II and XZ-10.
To sum up, both of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 II with its larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M10 II will produce greater detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 II is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus XZ-10 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2015-08-25 | 2013-01-30 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/1.8-2.7 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | - |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 390 gr (0.86 lb) | 221 gr (0.49 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 pictures | 240 pictures |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $499 | $428 |